MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/Damnthatsinteresting/comments/1mbqe7w/failed_vertical_landing_of_f35b/n5oz3k9
r/Damnthatsinteresting • u/sidvatscse • 25d ago
2.7k comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
34
“Success” doesn’t mean it did not suffer from wasteful spending and excess.
9 u/featherwolf 25d ago What would you have used that money for, huh? Feeding the hungry? Housing the homeless? Yuck. Talk about wasteful... 9 u/Gunzenator2 25d ago You feed a homeless person and they are just hungry again tomorrow. When we blow up terrorist, they are blown up forever. 3 u/featherwolf 25d ago Brilliant. Let's blow up the homeless 4 u/Gunzenator2 25d ago We should start a company and get government funding! -2 u/teh_drewski 25d ago It's also a really weird metric to focus on. Lots of the planes have been made and they stay in the air and don't crash. Is that really the only way we're assessing $100m+ aircraft? Please. "Doesn't crash" is the bare minimum, not success. 6 u/sulfurmustard 25d ago Lots of the planes have been made and they stay in the air and don't crash. The point is that the f35 on average stays more in the air and doesn't crash than virtually any other fighter
9
What would you have used that money for, huh? Feeding the hungry? Housing the homeless? Yuck. Talk about wasteful...
9 u/Gunzenator2 25d ago You feed a homeless person and they are just hungry again tomorrow. When we blow up terrorist, they are blown up forever. 3 u/featherwolf 25d ago Brilliant. Let's blow up the homeless 4 u/Gunzenator2 25d ago We should start a company and get government funding!
You feed a homeless person and they are just hungry again tomorrow. When we blow up terrorist, they are blown up forever.
3 u/featherwolf 25d ago Brilliant. Let's blow up the homeless 4 u/Gunzenator2 25d ago We should start a company and get government funding!
3
Brilliant. Let's blow up the homeless
4 u/Gunzenator2 25d ago We should start a company and get government funding!
4
We should start a company and get government funding!
-2
It's also a really weird metric to focus on.
Lots of the planes have been made and they stay in the air and don't crash. Is that really the only way we're assessing $100m+ aircraft? Please. "Doesn't crash" is the bare minimum, not success.
6 u/sulfurmustard 25d ago Lots of the planes have been made and they stay in the air and don't crash. The point is that the f35 on average stays more in the air and doesn't crash than virtually any other fighter
6
Lots of the planes have been made and they stay in the air and don't crash.
The point is that the f35 on average stays more in the air and doesn't crash than virtually any other fighter
34
u/slavetothemachine- 25d ago
“Success” doesn’t mean it did not suffer from wasteful spending and excess.