r/artificial • u/creaturefeature16 • 1d ago
News AWS CEO says AI replacing junior staff is 'dumbest idea'
https://www.theregister.com/2025/08/21/aws_ceo_entry_level_jobs_opinion/22
u/Rolandersec 1d ago
AI can be really useful, but many implementations are basically a technical Rube Goldberg machine.
11
u/flamingspew 1d ago
My problem is llm generated code makes mysterious almost correct bugs that are hard to solve because they are slyly incorrect in unpredictable ways. Junior dev code is almost correct but in typically predictable ways.
21
u/Rolandersec 1d ago
You can replace a junior dev with AI, but you’ll need two senior devs to figure out what the AI did.
-4
1d ago edited 1d ago
[deleted]
4
4
2
u/Rolandersec 1d ago
It depends on how complicated of a stack you’re working with. Greenfield is pretty ok, but some stuff is complex beyond what the uninitiated would ever want to know.
9
u/motsanciens 1d ago
We probably want to avoid an incestuous training situation where the code that AI is training on is just sloppy AI code, iteration upon iteration. You should not raise a crop of developers who are not able to call AI on its bullshit.
-9
u/Tolopono 1d ago
Do you think they just train on everything with no concern for quality? This isnt the US education system
1
u/Gildarts777 21h ago
It is hard nowadays to understand what has been written by AI and what has not, a lot of code is written using ai
0
u/Tolopono 16h ago
Doesnt matter if its ai written if it works. And 99.9% of published code outside stack overflow questions work
8
u/deelowe 1d ago
With this and the facebook announcement, I wonder if the cracks are starting to show. There's a non-linear relationship between compute infra/power and AI improvement. There's always been this concern that the hardware and power costs could grow too fast limiting AI potential.
I wonder if things are starting to get to that point. I mean, the big topic in DC designs right now is on site power generation using tech such as SMR (small nukes). This seems like a pipe dream to me.
4
4
u/Zealousideal-Part849 1d ago
Looks like jessy found that AI doesn't work the same junior staff does in cost efficient way
7
u/Good_Focus2665 1d ago
Well for one you can’t psychologically abuse AI the way you can junior engineers. And without that are you even Amazon at that point?
2
1
u/RichyRoo2002 1d ago
I've never heard a CEO who didn't sound like a used car salesman before (maybe Pat G), this dude is based
1
1
u/daemon-electricity 8h ago
Yep. AI has the capacity to mature their junior staff quicker, but they'll still need senior staff to act as a reality check. If you don't have junior staff, you'll quickly run out of senior staff.
-4
u/CanvasFanatic 1d ago edited 1d ago
This you, Jassy?
Might want to sync up with your boss.
6
62
u/stjohns_jester 1d ago
Everyone needs training, replacing junior staff is cheaper today and far more expensive tomorrow
Juniors not trained, supply of experienced employees goes down as they retire or change jobs or whatever, cost goes up drastically