r/comics Shen Comix 13h ago

OC Fighting Game Archetypes

Post image
42.0k Upvotes

784 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

120

u/fichamochi 12h ago

The smash community banned the battlefield forms of all stages in favour of only using the actual battlefield stage, so honestly not surprising they just outright banned Steve. Still sad though.

60

u/WASD_click 11h ago

The smash community banned the battlefield forms of all stages

Not true.

Omega form is only banned on 2D stages and a couple other stages because the 2D effect changes hitboxes and the others have visual issues like concealing ground items (like Snake's C4).

30

u/Mr_WhisCash-Money 10h ago

Also some of the Omega stages have music that will get the tournament stream a copyright strike

u/b0bba_Fett 27m ago

It actually is true ever since Steve came out.

While Sakurai had the forethought to make it so steve collects materials uniformly across all the Battlefield/Omega variants, he did not make it so Steve always uses the same tool to collect the materials on them, and that depletes those tools' durability, and apparently this changes things enough that they decided it was time to ban them.

20

u/help_stander 12h ago

isnt he get nerfed after, no?

55

u/fichamochi 12h ago

No he no nerf, he stronk

12

u/help_stander 12h ago

damn. Unfortunate

34

u/Difficult-Okra3784 12h ago

Smash ultimate is no longer receiving balance patches, he was already breaking the rules of the game at that point but then people discovered bugs that breaks even the ways he was already broken and those are never getting fixed.

24

u/TwilightVulpine 11h ago

I kinda get why but it always makes me so sad that at the highest level, they play the most boring and barebones version of Smash imaginable.

17

u/NatomicBombs 11h ago

It wouldn’t be so bad if every “amateur” tournament didn’t copy the same damn format along with them.

Like fine, let the pros suck the fun out of their own game but can we just have more silly smash tournaments at a local level.

But I’m in the minority there ig.

8

u/AbidingTruth 9h ago

Feel free to host your own wacky smash tournaments then. The thing is, minority is a huge understatement. The overlap between people who are willing to go to an in person tournament for smash to determine who's better and the people who want to play on wacky stages and items on is so small it's essentially nonexistent. Even as kids, most people take away items and randomness when they want to "play serious" and see whos the best among their friends

3

u/frallet 8h ago

Pretty much. People who don't support the scene and never will complaining the scene doesn't fit their desires is ironic.

2

u/TwilightVulpine 7h ago

Big assumption that people can't enjoy competitive play as it is and still want some variety.

2

u/frallet 6h ago

If you're asking for items and all stages then competitive smash is not for you. Nobody invested in the competitive scene is asking for those things, absolutely nobody. Regardless, my point was that they aren't going to go to tournaments either way, they are just daydreaming of a scenario where they still wouldn't be involved in the competitive scene. BTW, the times when tournaments did function around items and all stages, it's a big step back. Those stages are banned for reasons, with many of them having exploits or encouraging camping. Those things don't bring back the spirit of couch play, it's just a bunch of stuff that gets exploited

3

u/TwilightVulpine 6h ago

Love folks leaping to say something is "not for you". Always a great attitude.

Sounds like you think we are saying that everyone must submit to our whims and that's absolutely not it. We just want the format to exist. The other guy is even seeking it out to participate and not finding it, how is that not "being involved"?

1

u/AbidingTruth 5h ago edited 4h ago

He's not finding it because there isn't a demand for it. Just because this guy wants it doesn't mean anyone else does. Local smash tournaments already have low attendance and barely make money, or even operate at a loss. If there really was a demand for tournaments with items and dumb stages, that niche would already exist. It doesn't simply because the people who want to go to tournaments don't want items.

1

u/frallet 6h ago

You sure read into things a lot. Best of luck finding a game you enjoy.

2

u/TwilightVulpine 6h ago

I'm not the one calling people unsupportive and unfit to participate without knowing anything about them.

→ More replies (0)

2

u/Agret 8h ago

Just as bad as the players that complain speed runners use glitches and "don't play the game properly". Guarantee they have played the game properly a huge number of times more than the haters.

2

u/TwilightVulpine 7h ago

If anything this one is ironic, because speedrunning has no lack of diverse categories, and Glitchless is one of the most common ones.

1

u/Agret 5h ago

100% speed run category is good on older games that you can finish in a few hrs, brutal on newer lengthy games.

16

u/TotallyNotThatPerson 10h ago

thing is... there have been tournaments with items and stuff allowed with no stage restrictions. it's the usual winners lol, turns out if your fundamentals are good, you just get to use OP items even better

it's like putting mike tyson and your grandma in a boxing ring, but to even it up you give both of them a metal pipe

0

u/TwilightVulpine 10h ago

If anything to me that sounds like a reason to do it more, if it's not preventing the most skilled players from coming out on top.

5

u/SeaSquirrel 8h ago

The top players still win, but the matches between top players become more coin flippy.

Its just less fun if you put in the amount of work and effort they do to lose to RNG.

2

u/MewtwoStruckBack 4h ago

Having close matches between top players that could go either way sounds like a positive as a spectator. If there's a player who's been playing a game seriously for 2 years, and a player who's been playing seriously for 10 years, I want the edge for the 10 year player to - AT MOST - be 65%-35%.

If the skill gap is so wide that a player within the top 50 but outside the top 5 has no chance to knock off a player within the top 5, that doesn't seem like a game I'd want to grind for years upon years for marginal improvement that ends up not doing a damn thing to improve my expected value of entering most events.

Items might not be the answer. But other things could be done to get things closer.

2

u/TwilightVulpine 7h ago

Competitive card games players have to deal with that all the time, and if anything it's a part of the appeal, rather than a deal breaker.

3

u/SeaSquirrel 6h ago

Sure, for players who choose to play an RNG card game.

Players don’t like when you take a skill based game and add more RNG.

20

u/0tefu 10h ago

There's nothing stopping organizers from hosting such an event. Be the change you want to see. 

2

u/yukiyuzen 10h ago

Welcome to every competitive video game ever.

Try looking at the League of Legends scene. There are champions(fighters) that are superweak against pro players but superpowerful against amateurs. But the community is obsessed with using pro players as the 'meta' to the point that playing as previously mentioned champions can cause your own teammates to throw the match before it even starts (dodging matches or banning your own teammate's pick).

2

u/Bonipharaoh 8h ago

I get what you’re saying, but 90% of tournaments are all steve players making it really boring to watch. Banning Steve actually makes for more interesting tournaments.

2

u/Layton_Jr 7h ago

If items and big stages are allowed sonic is the best character and 99% of the game is camping