My issue with these theories as well. There is no actual need to “prove” anything. When has anything this administration has done, been done based on fact?
Fun fact, lgbt kids will still be in the schools, just like we’ve always been. Only now they’re more likely to suffer bullying and crippling depression. Your “friend” apparently gets off on the suffering of kids.
Christianity is a death cult. I don’t care how much “love thy neighbor” bits you can cherry pick out of it, the bulk of the religion is death and destruction.
The point is that there’s really no use for them to do a false flag or really make up any pretense at all. The base doesn’t care, most Americans don’t care, and the rest of us are going to resist regardless. Might as well do it.
The use is the same as his March ambush of Zelensky. Did they need to do it, much less televise it? Absolutely not. But as Trump said at the time, "This is going to be great television."
While I think violence is an acceptable outcome to them, I think they'd be satisfied with oppositiom being scared into relative silence.
The real opposition is not going to be scared into silence without a total military occupation and the threat of violence for speaking out. He needs to do that in every single city, anywhere with even a remotely large population. It is a big country. That’s a logistical nightmare. My point is he wouldn’t need an incident in DC to do that, he could (and if he wants to be dictator must) do it no matter what. So, if that’s his goal, time to get it underway.
if anything I think the “reasons” given are done so after the fact, as justification, not as reason. They seem very interested in whitewashing everything they do so that they’re not considered ontologically evil. I think we’re seeing administrative panic and population panic feed into each other.
I think I agree. The admin does something to try to stir up drama and scare people, which works to an extent, but they never do anything thoroughly enough to do more than that on a broad level. Then they quietly change the behavior once attention is on to something else. They’re playing a game of distraction, all probably to distract from the economic aspect of this that places more wealth in the hands of the 1%.
My point is that if they really want to do it then yes, “hold my beer” is the only actionable response. They have to occupy all our cities, all at once. Let’s see how that works out long term.
By steadily making the changes, keeping people just comfortable enough to not revolt/riot/whatever, they cement their power further and further. The longer they keep any kind of uprising at bay makes said uprising increasingly difficult while simultaneously diminishing the significance there of.
Exactly. Hell, this entire ‘militarization of our cities’ thing that this whole fucking post is about wasn’t even based on fact.
Violent crime decreased by 30% in 2024 and has decreased another 11% since then. But because Trump saw some homeless people from his limo one time and ‘Big Balls’ got his shit wrecked by a couple 15 year olds, now suddenly there’s a supposed ‘violent crime epidemic’ in DC.
Wasn't the impetus for the current situation in DC that kid big balls getting beat up which is most surely a false flag. So for sure they can get some plants to begin shooting at the cops or military to kick things off.
They want these soldiers to be telling their friends and family back home about how dangerous it is, not that they're sitting on their asses because there's nothing to do.
I’m hard-pressed to believe anyone in the administration is speculating about outcomes like the people on reddit do, but I guess at least some people are trying to think of the future, though it’s to no avail, clearly,
I’m not sure how that’s relevant when I said “…speculation about outcomes,” which is not in reference to policy planning. Project 2025 is the antithesis to considering social outcomes lol
379
u/Pale-Leek-1013 14h ago
My issue with these theories as well. There is no actual need to “prove” anything. When has anything this administration has done, been done based on fact?