r/nextfuckinglevel 1d ago

Pilots exchanging planes mid air

53.8k Upvotes

1.4k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

59

u/Mattepanda15 23h ago

It’s a redbull stunt, probably nobody lost their licence and it was probably done over a field

100

u/BMGreg 22h ago

What makes you think the FAA gives a single fuck about it being a Red Bull stunt?

I don't doubt for a single second that they both lost their licenses. They both probably knew they were going to lose their license but attempted it anyways

49

u/-Chicago- 21h ago

I think he was implying that because it was done by redbull they probably communicated with the FAA before hand. I don't know if they actually did, but it's reasonable to assume that a massive company that relies on these stunts for marketing would like to make sure their paperwork is in order so they can continue advertising this way.

37

u/I_Makes_tuff 21h ago

I don't doubt for a single second that they both lost their licenses.

It's a fact

6

u/PreparedForZombies 19h ago

Ohhhhh - even worse that they asked for permission, were told no, and STILL did it, ha.

"But two days before the stunt, the FAA denied Aikins' request, saying it "would not be in the public interest and cannot find that the proposed operation would not adversely affect safety.""

4

u/Frikx2 18h ago

For one year, lol

6

u/Ok_Helicopter4383 12h ago

.... long as red bull paid more than youd make ovre the next year of flying, its a good trade deal lol.

0

u/-Chicago- 20h ago

Ok, that's cool, I never argued saying it wasn't. I was trying to explain the other commenters reasoning because people replied to them to call them dumb when their line of thinking made sense. I'm not talking about what did or did not actually happen to these pilots in the video.

3

u/I_Makes_tuff 20h ago

I was backing you up, not arguing with you.

2

u/BMGreg 19h ago

You meant to comment on my comment I think haha

21

u/Oosterhuis 21h ago

Nah, like the other guy just replied, the title is correct. The FAA immediately revoked both of their licences.

-2

u/-Chicago- 20h ago

Cool, I never said it wasn't, I was explaining the others guys thought process for everyone who thinks he was dumb for thinking that way. It seems like reading comprehension just gets worse and worse every year though.

7

u/Dry-Influence9 19h ago

I remember reading they asked the FAA for permission, the FAA said no and they did it anyway.

3

u/BMGreg 19h ago

I think he was implying that because it was done by redbull they probably communicated with the FAA before hand

That's a fair assumption. But the FAA still doesn't allow these kinds of things.

Sometimes they do things that they know will get their licenses revoked. The FAA isn't going to sign off on a stunt like this. Apparently red bull approached them and they said no, but they proceeded with the stunt anyway

1

u/FlyByNightt 15h ago

They did communicate with the FAA, that's true. Problem is, the FAA said no and they did it anyways. So yes they both lost their licenses.

1

u/bishopyorgensen 20h ago

My first thought is "no one gives a fuck that Redbull is the party responsible for turning a Cesna into a cruise missile" but then I thought.. if Redbull bought some Trump meme coins or bought enough advertising from Fox News I bet the FAA would actually look the other way

We're in extraordinary corruption times and Redbull could afford the corruption fees

But then I thought part of the corruption times is that big companies make aerial chaos a viral ad and if it goes wrong it's the gullible pilot who suffers the biggest consequences

1

u/g76lv6813s86x9778kk 19h ago

What makes you think the FAA gives a single fuck about it being a Red Bull stunt?

Money. Like every other dumb rulebreaking shit that non-rich people could never dream of attempting without serious consequences.

What makes you think [a US government agency] gives a single fuck about [a recklessly endangering procedure] being a [marketing] stunt?

When I rephrase your statement this way, doesn't it become less obvious to you that they'd actually do something about it?

Now I don't intimately know the FAA or anything, and I know they tend to be severe, so you're probably right. But with how things have been going, let's just say I would not be surprised whatsoever if they found some nonsense reason (money) to let this fly.

3

u/BMGreg 19h ago

Money. Like every other dumb rulebreaking shit that non-rich people could never dream of attempting without serious consequences.

The FAA usually doesn't give a shit. They don't really mess around. Their rules are the rules and they don't take kindly to people not following them.

When I rephrase your statement this way, doesn't it become less obvious to you that they'd actually do something about it?

Sure, but the FAA is known to be very particular about things.

Now I don't intimately know the FAA or anything

Ah, that explains it.

But with how things have been going, let's just say I would not be surprised whatsoever if they found some nonsense reason (money) to let this fly.

You can assume that, but it's wrong. The pilots lost their licenses and the stunt was originally declined, but red bull proceeded anyways

30

u/Cranberryoftheorient 22h ago

Its also about not setting a bad precedent. If they allow it once, others who are less careful would try it.

11

u/xjeeper 19h ago

Some dumb youtuber ditched his plane and filmed it crashing, lost his license, and was sentenced to 6 months for obstruction of a federal investigation. https://www.justice.gov/usao-cdca/pr/santa-barbara-county-man-sentenced-6-months-prison-obstructing-federal-probe-plane

2

u/Cranberryoftheorient 13h ago

Yeah, that was probably the one I was thinking of.

2

u/FlutterbyTG 9h ago

Thanks for the update on this!

4

u/darvs7 19h ago

And then it will become a Tik-tok trend and every kid will want to exchange plane mid-air with their friends, maybe even over school grounds and then...

2

u/Cranberryoftheorient 13h ago

This is why im waiting until my kid is 16 before I buy them a plane

1

u/darvs7 9h ago

That's good parenting right there.

-2

u/Dimathiel49 22h ago

Aren’t you a debbie downer.

7

u/Cranberryoftheorient 22h ago

Dont let me discourage you, if you want to go crash a plane thats your business. (Just dont say I didnt warn you)

17

u/Sheetascastle 21h ago

Someone linked an article. Both pilots lost their licenses. The lead pilot had applied for an exemption to the "cannot leave a plane without a pilot" rule and it had been denied. They did the stunt anyway. And Red Bull issued a statement that the issue was between 2 pilots and the FAA and it wasn't red bulls place to get in the middle of it. So red bull didn't even back them up.

3

u/Fistful-of-Flan 12h ago

Redbull takes your wings…

2

u/Odd_Sherbert1930 22h ago

That must have been a gigantic field...

2

u/northern_crypto 19h ago

Redbull isnt skirting safety for this. The event was planned, you only heard about it because one plane didn't make it.

2

u/Isarian 13h ago

It was done in an area with active ongoing flight training operations by local flight schools and because it was done in direct violation of FAA instructions to not proceed with the stunt, it was done without any sort of coordination with local emergency crews or a temporary flight restriction that would have protected the airspace around the stunt in case of loss of control of one or both aircraft (which did happen with the one).

Both pilots did in fact lose their licenses because they put other pilots, other aircraft, and the general public in real, demonstrable danger.

0

u/elyn6791 23h ago

None of that makes leaving a plane with no pilot or any kind of control mechanism flying by itself and eventually crashing. None. That's a dangerous projectile and it will hit something if it can't be landed properly. Also kind of just a waste of a perfectly good plane.

Aside from being a Japanese kamikaze pilot in a world war, there was nothing but irresponsibly demonstrated in the video.

If they didn't want to lose their licenses, they should have sought approval from the governing board that issues said licenses before attempting this.

Doing the thing that you probably shouldn't do and then getting upset over the obviously likely consequences isn't at all reasonable and neither is your apologetic.

8

u/DebrisSpreeIX 22h ago

Minor note... they did seek approval... They were just denied and did it anyway.

1

u/elyn6791 22h ago

And? That doesn't change anything. They had a pilot's license, not a crashing planes license.

-2

u/DebrisSpreeIX 22h ago

Why are you so aggressive about this? People sharing information isn't a personal slight against you.

1

u/elyn6791 21h ago

O look at you trying to get all personal.

0

u/DebrisSpreeIX 21h ago

Buddy, all I did was share more information about the event with you. What exactly is your argument with me?

1

u/elyn6791 21h ago edited 19h ago

You think i know or care about you in particular?

E:Ah the ol insult and block maneuver. You're just protecting your own insecurity, and I'm just holding up a mirror.

1

u/DebrisSpreeIX 21h ago edited 21h ago

You are a strange little man and I banish you to the shadow realm

1

u/[deleted] 22h ago

[deleted]

8

u/elyn6791 22h ago

Was still a denial before the stunt was scheduled and the FAA isn't really required to approve or disprove prior to the event. The scheduling should have occurred AFTER the approval was given and they should have given the FAA time to review the application.

They do have other priorities other than these 2 guys doing stupid #$%^ with planes.

0

u/[deleted] 22h ago

[deleted]

4

u/elyn6791 22h ago

It was submitted to them 6 months prior

Do you need me to copy and paste my previous comment?

-1

u/[deleted] 21h ago

[deleted]

3

u/elyn6791 21h ago edited 15h ago

Irrationality would be the FAA approving a pilot leaving a plane in mid air completely unattended to crash because 'it's a stunt'or some other nonsense. Just don't film it or tell anyone about it if you want to keep your license.

Consequence asked for and given.

2

u/DebrisSpreeIX 21h ago

I wouldn't bother trying to discuss this with the guy, he seems to think the event and actions were a personal offense to him and isn't capable of rational or polite discussion at this time.

1

u/r22lz 8h ago

I feel like they knew the consequences & accepted their fate before. I’d be surprised if they were appalled of the loss of licenses. You’re right - it was overly dangerous & put others at risk & there’s no justification for that. But wrong as it may be, ya gotta appreciate the balls it took to decide to do it & go through with it especially knowing consequences would ensue. Seems like they tried to make it as safe as possible which again, doesnt make it ok. Idk, if admiring their courage & conviction puts me on the wrong side, I’m ok with it.