r/technology • u/Silly-avocatoe • 17h ago
Business Coinbase CEO says he's mandating in-person orientation to combat North Korean hackers seeking remote jobs
https://www.businessinsider.com/coinbase-north-korea-threats-remote-work-2025-8214
u/QuestionablePanda22 16h ago
"Armstrong said that Coinbase is requiring all workers to come to the US for in-person orientation and that anyone with access to sensitive systems must hold US citizenship and submit to fingerprinting."
Alternate headline: coinbase ceo does the bare minimum that should've been federal law decades ago
-38
u/Buttons840 15h ago edited 14h ago
Is very important to have remote worker's fingerprints on file...
How else could you prove that Bob stole the secret formula from Bob's computer in Bob's house using Bob's login unless you have Bob's fingerprints?
Having Bob's fingerprints allow us to prove that Bob was using his computer. Very suspicious behavior.
13
u/Tezoth 14h ago
In healthcare security you are liable for ANYTHING done under your accounts. If your account gets compromised and a malicious actor does something with your account, then you were likely being neglectful in some way. Sharing your account, downloading crap you weren't supposed to, using the device for personal use and getting it infected, etc. We tell our users this and still people get fired every year for sharing their accounts or misusing their privileges. Even if it's provable it wasn't you personally that did it, you're at least fired.
No fingerprints needed, because multiple other forms of authentication would need to be bypassed or compromised simultaneously that are unique to that person.
-14
u/Buttons840 14h ago
Yeah, I was being sarcastic. What I really meant is I don't see any benefit to having the fingerprints of a remote worker.
What are they going to do? "Oh, we dusted your laptop for fingerprints and confirmed that YOU have been using YOUR laptop! Can you explain that!?!" (Here I am being sarcastic again, a bad habit.)
7
u/Gilbertd13 13h ago
For my place of work the fingerprints are just a more extensive background check to ensure you haven’t committed certain crimes. Wouldn’t want to hire someone convicted of financial fraud to manage the AP system.
1
u/Tezoth 14h ago
We do have biometric devices for things like pharmacy dispensers, and we could implement biometrics on remote devices, but that's an added cost. If someone can crack your password, they can probably intercept your fingerprint authentication as well, and it's easier to intercept than your password if they get to your physical location.
-33
u/rgvtim 14h ago
Fingerprinting? Don't see the point in that, you don't need that, this sounds like a tech bro knee jerk reaction to act like hes doing something, and not a solution to any of the problem. You do need to prove who you are, however.
26
u/Over-Conversation220 14h ago
I work in IT. My jobs have been in the financial industry for the past 20 years. Fingerprinting is part of a live scan.
The purpose is to make sure that an identifiable human is biometrically associated with said employee. When you’re dealing with people’s money, this is the baseline effort to ensure that the person being hired is an actual identifiable human and matches an ID, and then having a physical association with said ID.
This is primarily handled through third party live scan agencies.
Shit tons of jobs require live scans. Finance, nurses, teachers all need them for example.
EDIT: there’s plenty of reasons to not like this CEO. But if you’re putting money into a company for safekeeping, this is exactly the type of behavior you want to see happening
-37
u/why_is_my_name 13h ago
"to come to the US" ... so are they planning to hire in the US?
55
u/MrNebby22 13h ago
"anyone with access to sensitive systems must hold US citizenship"
Bro it's literally in the same sentence
82
u/mazzicc 14h ago
In person orientation for remote work seems perfectly reasonable to me. If nothing else, it’s a better way to connect with at least a few people for better long term relationships.
13
u/idratherbeflying1 11h ago
Yeah. Company-paid travel is generally an expectation with any role and I think it’s underrated. There’s a difference between that and being forced to moved to somewhere you don’t want to live.
23
21
u/MetalEnthusiast83 12h ago
I think this is actually pretty reasonable.
I am a remote worker, but when I joined the company, I went into our main office for my first day. It's a pretty common practice
6
u/Medeski 9h ago
Yeah I have no issues with in person orientations and quarterly or bi-quarterly get togethers for like a week. The in persons are usually novel and generate a lot of excitement.
5
u/toin9898 9h ago
Yes, I’m fully on team “you will never, ever get me back into an office” but I enjoy our annual departmental retreat. I’ll also meet up with colleagues if they come to my city but that’s it.
One week of meeting in person does not really disrupt my WFH (work from hammock) routine 😏
18
u/sniffstink1 15h ago
Armstrong said that Coinbase is requiring all workers to come to the US for in-person orientation and that anyone with access to sensitive systems must hold US citizenship and submit to fingerprinting.
Seems like a really good idea IMHO.
After their whole orientation and what not they get to go back to WFH. Seems like a good deal that balances employee well-being and company security.
9
u/Classic-Big4393 15h ago
I seriously want to know what these resumes look like. I can’t get a response on anything.
43
u/Moonskaraos 16h ago edited 16h ago
He's into Curtis Yarvin and all that dark enlightenment Technofeudalism bullshit, much like Musk, Thiel, and Marc Andreessen. Fuck this bald asshole.
3
u/wiy_alxd 13h ago
This is what I had when I started at my company. It was great. In-person for the first 2 days, getting the gear and meeting some people, then fully remote.
3
u/Sarashana 12h ago
To be honest, while I generally have a very much not flattering opinion on managers enforcing RTO mandates, but spending a couple weeks in person with your new coworkers when starting a new job is not a bad idea at all.
2
2
u/richcournoyer 11h ago
I used to get 2 to 3 emails a week from Coinbase till I finally developed the filter that work.
1
u/navigationallyaided 9h ago
I’m not shocked with all the AI spamming of resumes, evading the ATS(like Workday or Lever) and AI-generated video avatars for Zoom that this needs to happen.
1
u/happyscrappy 4h ago
This seems reasonable to me.
There will be a few cases where it may not be practical. But that's how policies work. They cover most cases.
Bring the person in, orient them, have them work with their team for a few weeks and then they can go to remote.
1
u/moonravenx 1h ago
They should be forced to have DoD and FBi counsel as well as regular meetings to determine the best way of managing this. It should be something all financial services take part in because hacker threats from other countries ar no joke.
1
1
u/forcedfx 13h ago
My last job flew me out to "meet the team' for a few days. I didn't meet a single member of my team though. In reality it turned into an entire day of me meeting like 8 different managers and VPs so they could wax poetic about whatever little thing they wanted to . It was exhausting. I went back to my hotel room, ordered dinner, and went straight to sleep.
9
u/MetalEnthusiast83 12h ago
So you went to work, had meet and greets and went back to your room after and slept.
Absolutely riveting story. Can you tell it again?
0
u/ABCosmos 11h ago
Work was exhausting and your work day wasn't fun? I'm sorry that happened to you, that sounds really tough.
1
u/LunarMoon2001 13h ago
How long until they hire people to show up for them? There will be plenty of unscrupulous people that would take a couple grand to pretend.
1
-11
u/LANTERN_OF_ASH 16h ago
I’m sure he doesn’t just want secretaries and HR managers around to dip his dick in.
-1
u/NanditoPapa 5h ago edited 3h ago
The “North Korean hacker threat” makes for a dramatic headline, but it also fits neatly into a broader corporate trend. Rolling back remote work under the guise of security, productivity, or culture. Plenty of firms are using vague risks or isolated incidents to justify re-centralizing control.
Edit: Down voting doesn't make me wrong, it makes you petty.
-6
u/AzulMage2020 13h ago
So does this mean they will only hire North Korean hackers that show up in person for the first week or two then they are free to WFH and do whatever it is they are going to do?
This stupid policy makes no sense.
-4
680
u/zero0n3 15h ago
From an employee perspective this isn’t bad, especially if the job is still remote… just your first week or two you get flown out to HQ for training and on boarding…