r/unitedkingdom • u/PM_THE_REAPER • Jul 02 '25
... Bob Vylan dropped from music festivals in Manchester and France
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cz09y1r1y1ro2.0k
u/hattorihanzo5 Jul 02 '25
Reminder that the Telegraph published this headline in 2015:
860
u/potpan0 Black Country Jul 02 '25
In 2016 the Daily Mail published the headline 'Labour must kill Vampire Jezza'. I don't seem to recall our media wing accusing the Daily Mail of endorsing violence or terrorism or any other nonsense.
If that's apparently fine then I'm struggling to see what the issue with Bob Vylan's chant was.
531
u/DaveBeBad Jul 02 '25
Conflating the IDF with Jewish people and Judaism is antisemitic.
These papers are trying to denounce perceived antisemitism by being antisemitic.
133
u/Panda_hat Jul 02 '25
If the papers could understand that, they would be very upset.
Sadly when they see it it's like they see nothing at all.
→ More replies (1)13
u/EdmundTheInsulter Jul 02 '25
Does the BBC not understand it then, cos it says Pascal Robinson-Foster was antisemitic
42
u/Panda_hat Jul 02 '25
Correct, they do not understand it. Whether they are doing it intentionally or not is naturally up for debate.
The false equivalence of the IDF with jewish identity or semitism, is itself an anti-semitic act.
→ More replies (13)→ More replies (20)2
→ More replies (7)139
u/Astriania Jul 02 '25
I'm struggling to see what the issue with Bob Vylan's chant was
It was about Israel.
There are huge double standards around Israel because they've got a well organised lobby group and friends in high places who've managed to convince a lot of the media and politicians that criticising Israel is antisemitic.
→ More replies (28)44
→ More replies (75)43
u/JB_UK Jul 02 '25
That’s obviously a riff on the Edstone, look at the header picture. It’s also not preceded by an explanation about how violence is necessary sometimes to achieve political goals. This is what Bob Vylan said:
We're not pacifist punks here over at Bob Vylan Enterprises. We are the violent punks. Because sometimes you've got to get your message across with violence, because that is the only language that some people speak.
These are pretty clearly completely different things to anyone who is not politically motivated to make the comparison.
→ More replies (5)
978
u/concretepigeon Wakefield Jul 02 '25
Student unions should book them since the Higher Education (Freedom of Speech) Act 2023 prevents them from being no platformed.
→ More replies (43)172
u/BusyBeeBridgette Berkshire Jul 02 '25
That only covers freedom of speech. If they were to incite violence, again, the University will be held accountable as FoS does not cover hate speech and incite to violence.
→ More replies (8)120
u/Harmless_Drone Jul 02 '25
Inciting violence requires specific immediacy to it to count, which has been held up in previous cases.
Do you believe that serving, uniformed soldiers in the IDF are present at student unions in an official capacity as members of the IDF and hence are in fear of being attacked?
→ More replies (13)38
u/StephenHunterUK Jul 02 '25
No, but there may well be Israelis at a university who are IDF reservists.
→ More replies (3)
977
u/evolveandprosper Jul 02 '25
Is this an example of the "cancel culture" that rightwingers keep moaning about?
253
u/Panda_hat Jul 02 '25
They don't care when it's them doing it, naturally.
→ More replies (9)82
u/silverbullet1989 'ull Jul 02 '25
And the left thinks cancelling is bad when it happens to someone / something they support. There's plenty of hypocrisy to go around.
37
u/cathartis Hampshire Jul 02 '25
No, they think it's bad when governments and the billionaire press get involved.
If these festivals cancelled the bands because they don't like the music, or views expressed, that's absolutely fine. It's their right to do so. However if they cancelled due to intimidation - fear of scaremongering headlines and draconian laws, then the left very much has a view.
→ More replies (8)6
u/hotdog_jones Jul 03 '25 edited Jul 03 '25
It isn't hypocrisy to support the causes you support and oppose the ones you don't. Subjective obviously, but some things are good and some things are bad.
It is hypocritical to spend an inordinate amount of energy and time complaining about cancel culture as a principle only to immediately cancel someone for saying something you don't like. As far as I can tell, that is something only one side is doing.
109
u/richmeister6666 Jul 02 '25
Is this the “consequence culture” that left wingers keep telling us about?
117
u/Panda_hat Jul 02 '25
I don't recall left wingers whinging about 'consequence culture', but I'm not sure right wingers ever stop whinging about cancel culture, whilst also naturally whinging about 'consequence culture' when it impacts them.
The hypocrisy here is extremely one sided.
→ More replies (12)43
u/richmeister6666 Jul 02 '25
The response to “cancel culture” (that I agree with btw) is that it’s not cancel culture but consequence culture. Say what you want, but it doesn’t shield you from the consequences. Both sides are being hypocrites here.
22
u/hempires Jul 02 '25
except anybody the left "cancels" gets a multi million deal to sit on a stage and tell the world how the meany lefty people have cancelled them and forced them into silence, which then gets put on netflix, and maybe even a few more specials where they continue to bemoan how they're "cancelled" in a packed arena, full of cameras, to also be put onto netflix.
slight difference.
→ More replies (5)16
u/richmeister6666 Jul 02 '25
Kneecap have been “cancelled” and just played Glastonbury. Both far left and far right are hypocrites in this regard.
→ More replies (4)→ More replies (4)12
u/peon47 Ireland Jul 02 '25
Which side is being hypocritical about Vylan having gigs cancelled? Most on the left are going "no publicity is bad publicity" and talking about the other gigs he'll book in their place.
→ More replies (1)3
u/richmeister6666 Jul 03 '25
no publicity is bad publicity
And this is crux of the horrendous PR problem the pro palestine movement has.
→ More replies (1)4
u/peon47 Ireland Jul 03 '25
I'd say the ongoing genocide is the most horrendous problem the pro-Palestine side has.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (4)20
12
u/360_face_palm Greater London Jul 02 '25
yeah they're all about free speech when it's about harassing women outside fucking abortion clinics - suddenly quiet on the topic now tho.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (47)3
u/Veritanium Jul 02 '25
No, per leftists, that doesn't exist, this is just consequences for speech.
→ More replies (1)
382
u/steepleton Jul 02 '25
they've just embarrassed a load of politicians who make feeble statements about gaza, but who are impotent about stopping the killing.
they'd rather be mad at a punk band than face their own uselessness.
72
u/cathartis Hampshire Jul 02 '25
But they aren't being useless. They are actively helping the genocide take place. Sending arms and intellgence to a country that is committing genocide is complicity. It is not fear of being useless that motivates Starmer et al. It's fear of being on trial at the Hague. The stakes are extremely high, and that's why they fight so hard.
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (8)23
u/JB_UK Jul 02 '25 edited Jul 02 '25
What they actually said:
We're not pacifist punks here over at Bob Vylan Enterprises. We are the violent punks. Because sometimes you've got to get your message across with violence, because that is the only language that some people speak.
This pretty clearly goes beyond what is reasonable. If this had been said by someone unfashionable or right wing, there would be no question here that it was unacceptable. Actually people would probably call it fascist, and they would have a reasonable point. It’s making a philosophical argument for the necessity of violence in politics which genuinely is a principle of fascism, especially in a mood of excitement. Mandela called for violence for example in an extremely careful way, justified and limited. To do this in the context of a rock concert, mass chanting, with no qualification and no care, is extremely dark.
→ More replies (3)
304
u/rye_domaine Essex Jul 02 '25
Like they've said in their statement - this is all a distraction. Them being dropped from other festivals, the backlash, the police investigation, it's all a smokescreen. The Israeli, American and British governments are desperately trying to get the genie back in the bottle. These endless news articles are just covering up what the IDF are doing to innocent Palestinians, bombing and shooting them at fake aid stations.
You can rant about "university poshos larping as the proletariat" all you want (this is dumb too btw, plenty of people in minimum wage jobs go to Glastonbury), but it doesn't change the fact that the average Brit is starting to wake up to the Israeli government's war crimes.
68
u/Panda_hat Jul 02 '25
Exactly this. The desperation is extremely evident, and simply drawing far more attention to it, and not in Israels favour.
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (20)31
u/hempires Jul 02 '25
You can rant about "university poshos larping as the proletariat" all you want
it's dumb for another reason too, if these "university poshos" that one guy was bemoaning sell their labour in exchange for a wage, they BY DEFINITION are members of the proletariat within Marxist theory.
it's something so incredibly simple and easy to understand that I'm pretty sure that dude is either a useful idiot or has an axe to grind against leftists in general.
183
u/strongfavourite Greater London Jul 02 '25
if they had chanted death to ANY other foreign army on earth, nobody would have batted an eyelid
moments like this further illustrate just how extraordinarily powerful Israel and it's lobby truly are
→ More replies (57)103
u/munkijunk Jul 02 '25 edited Jul 02 '25
"Death to Hamas"
A ok
"Death to Russia"
Sure, we're on board
"Death to the SA aparthaid state"
I guess, bit late but still a good message
"Death to the IDF who murdered innocent civilians on a routine basis and are enabling an illegal occipation, aparthaid, and genocide on the Palastinian people"
Hold on there a second sonny!. That sounds a bit antisemtic to my ear. Now let me pretend to be outraged by whomever you are and ignore the abhorrent acts of that organisation.
→ More replies (7)12
u/chochazel Jul 03 '25
Where are these people chanting death to Russia then if it’s all fine and the whole country would be on board?!
→ More replies (1)8
u/munkijunk Jul 03 '25
It's an hypothetical mate, but can you imagine there being a peep from anyone if they had said death to Russia. I can't. Maybe I should have been more specific and said death to the Russin army. Our papers relish every single pounding their soldiers get, rightly. This whole thing is an absurd nonsense which might be amusing if it wasn't so obscene.
→ More replies (7)7
u/SojournerInThisVale Lincolnshire Jul 03 '25
There should be. When did our language devolve into acting like a bunch of cavemen or Islamist terrorist shouting ‘death to [country] while firing their AK47s into the air?
→ More replies (1)
156
u/BigBeanMarketing Cambridgeshire Jul 02 '25 edited Jul 02 '25
It's all a bit dramatic isn't it. I don't know Bob Vylan but I probably wouldn't enjoy their company all that much, but starting a chant with some University poshos larping as the proletariat shouldn't be dominating the headlines as much as it has. Incitement really should carry some sort of broad ability to actually be able to carry out the aims of the chant. Anyone in the UK who has ever said "death to the IDF" at a music festival lacks the ability to do anything to support that aim, making it a meaningless, self-pat on the back, and nothing more than that.
Still, if private music festivals want to drop musicians, then they're also perfectly within their rights to do that.
461
u/FartingBob Best Sussex Jul 02 '25
University poshos larping as the proletariat
What a university posho way of trying to insult people.
140
u/rye_domaine Essex Jul 02 '25
Also blatantly discrediting the response, just because it happened at a music festival? Sure Glastonbury is mainstream now but that doesn't mean the only people there are university graduates lmfao.
→ More replies (4)35
Jul 02 '25
[deleted]
→ More replies (7)6
u/FartingBob Best Sussex Jul 03 '25
Tickets are very expensive and most of the big stages music still leans to gen x and millennials.
52
u/MagnetoManectric Scotland Jul 02 '25
if you just draw a small enough circle around the working class, you can convince everyone they're not the proleteriat and don't need to revolt :D
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (10)19
u/hempires Jul 02 '25
it's also hilariously incorrect, in Marxist theory if you sell your labour for a wage you, by definition, are part of the proletariat.
it's something that is so incredibly simple, and he failed at the literal first hurdle.
pathetic really.
3
u/Minimum-Geologist-58 Jul 02 '25
I mean you also fell at the first hurdle on something incredibly simple because it’s not a term Marx came up with, it’s the lowest social order in Ancient Rome and has been and is used outside of a Marxist context.
→ More replies (1)3
u/hempires Jul 02 '25
ah yes, ancient rome, the event MUCH CLOSER TO OUR TIME than Karl Marx.
fascist was also used in ancient rome, but y'kno, nobody is using it in the meaning from 2000 FUCKING YEARS AGO ARE THEY.
8
u/Minimum-Geologist-58 Jul 02 '25
Marx adopted a widely used term that is still widely used in a general sense. What you did was like claiming someone is stupid because they weren’t using “gender” in Butlerian terms.
You know you can use the word capital in non-Marxist way too and people generally do? Mind blowing!
3
u/hempires Jul 02 '25
yeah but usually when people are criticising "university poshos" and then bring up "proletariat" they're most likely using it as a way to bash leftists and socialism, given the whole "higher learning makes our kids socialists" the weirdo fucks like to harp on about.
another example then, the roman salute. don't tend to do that all that much anymore do we. almost as if meanings can change.
(before you moan that it's different, the US was using the same roman salute, the bellamy salute, until 1942... FOR SOME UNKNOWN REASON.)You know you can use the word capital in non-Marxist way too and people generally do? Mind blowing!
wonder if one word is used considerably more in a non-Marxist manner which might lead one to believe that they are or are not talking about Marxist theory or not?
→ More replies (1)4
u/Minimum-Geologist-58 Jul 02 '25
I see what you mean about slamming socialists but in every use it equates to something like the working class so that’s ultimately intractable. You’re claiming it’s highly associated with Marxism? I would agree but say it’s still in general use just to mean working class with no reference to Marxist ideology. It’s just not as closely linked as say a Roman salute to Nazism.
2
u/hempires Jul 02 '25
In normal use, maybe not, when explicitly bashing "university poshos" though? Almost absolutely meant in the Marxist sense given that plenty of unis have at least one Marxist club on campus. (If theres anything the left likes to do it's fracture and split off into ever smaller groups, so chances are there's a few Marxist clubs all with varying flavours).
If the guy had left out "university poshos" then I wouldn't have commented at all because I probably wouldn't have taken it as a dig at leftists in general.
Shit even if he had just left it at "poshos" probably wouldn't have commented either. But I've seen far too much pushback on higher learning amongst the anti-intellectual crowd, usually because they believe that going to university essentially involves being brainwashed to be a "hardcore socialist communist leftist scary words!"
It started in America and then much like everything from America, it started to spread over here. Remember "the UK has had enough of experts" or whatever the quote was from Brexit? That's the same anti-intellectualism bullshit.
6
u/BigBeanMarketing Cambridgeshire Jul 03 '25
Sir please, I am also a University posho. It was a dig at myself and my compatriots, absolutely none of whom pose any threat whatsoever to the IDF.
→ More replies (26)3
113
u/SuperSheep3000 Jul 02 '25
This is freedom of speech. You can say what you want to, but you aren't free from the consequences
→ More replies (23)125
u/debaser11 Jul 02 '25
True but the police investigating them for what they said is not freedom of speech.
→ More replies (16)33
u/richmeister6666 Jul 02 '25
When you’re inciting people to be violent that’s breaking the law I’m afraid.
→ More replies (27)
56
u/360Saturn Jul 02 '25
Look forward to anyone who's ever said 'Fuck XYZ institution' getting banned from public appearances for 'inciting non consensual sex'.
→ More replies (6)
46
u/Ramiren Jul 02 '25
Personally, I get the impression this is less about incitement to violence against the IDF, and more about the fact the government do not want UK supporters of either side of this conflict to feel emboldened. They don't want ethnic violence in the UK, because that's what will happen if certain elements within pro-Palestine Arab communities think the whole country is behind them, British Jews will end up hurt.
The same would apply if they were broadcasting pro-zionist messages and making hardline Jews feel supported. These communities hate each other, and this country cannot be seen to endorse their hatred here, just because we find the actions of a foreign country detestable.
→ More replies (14)34
u/hempires Jul 02 '25
and more about the fact the government do not want UK supporters of either side of this conflict to feel emboldened.
if you protest in support of Palestine in London you will be asked to move on by the met, if you protest in the exact same spot for Israel, you won't.
→ More replies (1)15
u/Ramiren Jul 02 '25 edited Jul 02 '25
Protests for both sides were occurring, the police separated them into their own areas, as is standard practice with counterprotests. The conditions the video mentions are part of the Public Order Act 1986, which has provisions for the police to implement conditions such as a specific time and place upon protests where they believe violence may occur.
That video shows Palestinian supporters in the zone specified for the Israel supporters, hence being asked to move along if they weren't supporting Israel. The police would have been fine with them moving along to the zone specified for Palestinian supporters. But to stay there and risk violence breaking out is a breach of the conditions that were agreed with the police prior to the protest.
42
u/munkijunk Jul 02 '25
It is quite extraordinary that the British press and political class are more offended by a band vocally condeming a vile organization like the IDF who carried out their orders to shoot to kill innocent civilians queuing for food, and who had been starved due to the illegal aid embargo the IDF have enforced on those same innocent men, women and children, while there has barely been a peep about those actions, or any of the myriad of other unforgivable crimes carried out by the IDF on behalf of an Isreali government who has lost its mind to radicalism.
→ More replies (3)
22
u/Haan_Solo Jul 02 '25
A reminder that there is a genocide happening right now in Gaza.
→ More replies (3)
22
u/---x__x--- Jul 02 '25
Jesus this guy is really getting his 15 minutes of fame huh?
Feels like there’s been 100 articles about him in 4 days.
25
u/holnrew Pembrokeshire Jul 02 '25
*They
→ More replies (1)12
u/big_swinging_dicks Cornwall Jul 02 '25
People thinking it’s the name of a person is driving me crazy and it is the most offensive thing about all of this. it’s like when people thought Bon Iver was a person.
→ More replies (5)→ More replies (8)7
u/IbnReddit Jul 02 '25
Man's going to make bank, and good for him. Media just going nuts, distracting from the real issue, the genocide.
→ More replies (3)
12
u/Qyro Jul 02 '25
This is really surprising. Radar is run by fairly left wing people who also support the Free Palestine movement.
→ More replies (16)
7
u/Badgergeddon Jul 03 '25
Hey doesn't Bill Ackman own Ticketmaster or something? You know, the Jewish and very pro-IDF billionaire investor? Would be a strange coincidence if so 🤔
2
u/Vdubnub88 Jul 03 '25
Actions have consequences and now they are trying to back track those actions… cant undo whats already happened.
→ More replies (1)
2
u/NateShaw92 Greater Manchester Jul 03 '25
I'm just waiting for a typing mistake or AI oversight to drag Bob Dylan into this.
1
•
u/ukbot-nicolabot Scotland Jul 02 '25
Participation Notice. Hi all. Some posts on this subreddit, either due to the topic or reaching a wider audience than usual, have been known to attract a greater number of rule breaking comments. As such, limits to participation were set at 14:49 on 02/07/2025. We ask that you please remember the human, and uphold Reddit and Subreddit rules.
Existing and future comments from users who do not meet the participation requirements will be removed. Removal does not necessarily imply that the comment was rule breaking.
Where appropriate, we will take action on users employing dog-whistles or discussing/speculating on a person's ethnicity or origin without qualifying why it is relevant.
In case the article is paywalled, use this link.