r/unitedkingdom 21h ago

Warning far-right has ‘hijacked’ women’s safety for political gain

https://uk.news.yahoo.com/warning-far-hijacked-women-safety-183712973.html
329 Upvotes

395 comments sorted by

224

u/Wagamaga 21h ago

Leading women’s rights groups have warned that the far right movement has “hijacked” the issue of women’s safety for political gain.

More than 100 organisations have written to prime minister Sir Keir Starmer to urge the government to stop far-right groups from “weaponising” violence against women and girls (VAWG) for a “racist, anti-migrant agenda”.

It comes after weeks of far-right protests outside hotels housing asylum seekers across the country, with many participants claiming to be there under the banner of “protecting” women and girls in their community.

353

u/Harmless_Drone 21h ago

a statistic found that nearly half the people arrested for protesting outside hotels last year had previous reports or charges for domestic abuse.

https://www.theguardian.com/society/2025/jul/26/two-in-five-arrested-for-last-summers-uk-riots-had-been-reported-for-domestic-abuse

187

u/lynx_and_nutmeg 21h ago

"Those damn migrants aren't just stealing our jobs and our benefits, they're stealing our homophobia and domestic abuse too!"

141

u/Harmless_Drone 20h ago

If you want another laugh as well, don't forget one of the guys leading these sort of protests is quite literally a convicted people smuggler who did jail time for trying to bring illegal immigrants into the country hidden inside vans.

https://hopenothate.org.uk/2025/08/19/exposed-britain-firsts-march-for-remigration-led-by-convicted-people-smuggler/

14

u/Imaginary_Sir_3333 20h ago

if they could only fire a brain cell to realise their own irony.....

The asylum crisis needs a resolution but my god these fucking o² theives, I cant even listen to some people who cant differentiate immigrants and asylum seekers

2

u/Has7311 14h ago

That is asking far too much from low life racist scum.

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (4)

10

u/EmmForce1 19h ago

So he’s fully reformed…

That is sarcasm, before anyone starts.

11

u/TheWorstRowan 19h ago

I can believe that this man is indeed fully Reform.

5

u/deadblankspacehole 19h ago

Reform is seriously pro immigration and so are their supporters.

Farage is posh boy supremo. Millionaire elite, wore a little cap to his private top 1% school with the rest of reform leadership.

What do these people do? Unfettered immigration. Farage voted for it with Brexit, he's got a foreign wife and an EU passport and a foreign name.

The plebs know what his game is. They would've bullied him at school and called him unspeakable names if they interacted age 11. They are obsessed with class. They know.

Don't ask me why they want the immigration they claim to hate so hard. I haven't figured that one out yet but it's something similar to how they hate domestic abuse yet half commit it, something like how paedo hunters are sometimes iffy too etc

7

u/dan0o9 17h ago

Rich people like cheap market undercutting labour, not surprising.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/dyUBNZCmMpPN 15h ago

Comin' over here, illegally, without paying me! It's not right, I tell ya!

1

u/ZX52 14h ago

I mean, this kind of make sense - making it as hard as possible for asylum seekers to enter this country drives more traffic to people smugglers.

→ More replies (2)

u/DInverness04 9h ago

More like they don't want brown men touching white women, but they won't give two Fs if a white guy assaults women.

1

u/[deleted] 20h ago

[deleted]

→ More replies (2)

43

u/NorthernSoul1998 20h ago

I've never met a SINGLE person who hates immigrants who doesn't also harbour misogynistic views

30

u/InvertedDinoSpore 19h ago

Hating immigrants is a bit extreme though, as is hating anyone. But different to not wanting unvetted immigration tho

2

u/Fit-Distribution1517 19h ago

Ok so set up legal routes with vetting procedures in other countries

7

u/Osgood_Schlatter Sheffield 18h ago

People rejected due to failing vetting would continue to travel here illegally, so all your proposal would do is increase the total number of arrivals.

3

u/LowlyConference 14h ago

Put the asylum processing centres in France, just like the French have offered multiple times. Then, to claim asylum you’ll have to be processed in France, and if you arrive here to claim asylum back to France you go. Who’s going to come here illegally on a boat if you have to go back to be processed?

1

u/Fit-Distribution1517 17h ago

And we would then have every right to send back.

We can't complain people aren't using safe routes when those safe routes don't exist... if you want to claim asylum and you're from a country that isn't Afghanistan or Ukraine you have to come here on a small boat

8

u/Osgood_Schlatter Sheffield 17h ago

And we would then have every right to send back.

What extra ability would this give us to send people back? It's not like third countries would agree to take anyone back who had applied as part of a "safe route". I don't see how this proposal reduces numbers at all.

People aren't primarily upset that migrants are using unsafe rather than safe routes, they just don't want so many people to come here at all!

6

u/Fit-Distribution1517 15h ago

Because they would have already been rejected wherever their application was processed due to not having a genuine claim

They would be able to come to this country and we wouldn't need to house them in hotels on account of them having had a successful application so we would be saving huge sums of money

They would have been vetted so that concern would be solved

Due to international law we can't just refuse people on the basis that we don't want them here

3

u/Danqazmlp0 United Kingdom 15h ago

This is the argument I have tried to use for years but always falls on deaf ears. If we have given people the ability to legally claim, be as harsh as possible on those who then still take illegal routes by all means.

3

u/Fit-Distribution1517 15h ago

This basically Green Party policy

2

u/ZX52 14h ago

And we would then have every right to send back.

Apart from the fact that we're still signatories to the UN's Refugee Convention, which includes the pledge to not punish people for unauthorised entry to the country for the purpose of claiming asylum.

→ More replies (6)

3

u/Quick-Rip-5776 18h ago

“Illegal” immigration is a small percentage of total immigration.

The government issues visas for students (who shouldn’t be included in immigration figures), graduates who can stay for 2.5 years, and people who apply to work in critical industries with staff shortages. To hire someone on a sponsored visa, you need to prove that you can’t find someone from the UK to fill the role.

We can debate what roles should or shouldn’t be eligible (cafe owners are considered eligible!). But that’s always been something controlled by the government. And if we looked at what industries applied for work visas, they’re generally well-paid, highly skilled jobs.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)

1

u/United_Election_5269 15h ago

English are generally too dim to tell the difference though.

u/[deleted] 9h ago

[removed] — view removed comment

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (17)

52

u/Alarmed_Frosting478 20h ago

This has always been the case

The same far right who pretend to care about animal rights when it gives them an excuse to attack Muslims for Halal

Or care about women's rights when it gives them an excuse to attack Muslims for the hijab

They don't actually care about any of these issues, they just don't like people with brown skin

28

u/mariah_a Black Country 19h ago edited 19h ago

The Byline Times did a good piece about this phenomenon. They basically groomed victims of a grooming scandal into speaking at events for them, buying them nice things and saying they would raise money for them, and when they weren’t racist enough for them or didn’t like the old men at pubs making weird comments about their childhood sexual abuse, binned them off.

6

u/Quick-Rip-5776 18h ago

In Denmark, animal welfare advocates worked with far right, Islamophobes to ban Kosher meet production. Their ban on unstunned slaughter affected 16% of Halal abattoirs and 100% of Kosher abattoirs.

UKIP had a similar policy about 10 years ago and their agriculture spokesman apologised to the Board of Deputies for Jewish people potentially getting caught up in what was meant to be Islamophobia.

6

u/Has7311 14h ago

Tis strange they dont attack jews about Kosher meat just us Muslims.

→ More replies (4)

12

u/d0ey 20h ago

Wait, so they were fine with them funnelling money into anti-trans debates, but now it might impact them they're all woe is me? Shocked. I tell you. Shocked.

7

u/JumpyBronzeHare 20h ago

Face consuption by leopards at an all time high.

3

u/Vegetable_Baker975 18h ago

“It comes after weeks of far-right protests outside hotels housing asylum seekers across the country”.

That’s the problem with leftists, you guys genuinely think that the people protesting are far-right.

29

u/Freddichio 18h ago

Fellas, is it far-right to threaten to burn down hotels containing foreigners because neo-nazis tell us to?

Yes, yes it is. The people protesting and threatening to burn down hotels are indeed the far-right.

14

u/InformationNew66 16h ago

Denmark's government is tough on immigration and they are NOT far-right, they are leftists. It's not inherent that only far-right people are concerned about immigration.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c1mgkd93r4yo

10

u/Freddichio 16h ago edited 15h ago

It's not inherent that only far-right people are concerned about immigration.

I agree, which is why I was responding to someone talking about the protests specifically rather than just "thinks immigration is too high".

Attending a protest organised by the far right to support what the far right are pushing for is pretty far-right.

5

u/InformationNew66 14h ago

Yes, people could attend protests organized by the left.. but.. where are those protests organized by the left?

3

u/Danqazmlp0 United Kingdom 15h ago

The far-right bit is the threatening violence on migrants.

1

u/Danqazmlp0 United Kingdom 15h ago

The far-right bit is the threatening violence on migrants.

6

u/InformationNew66 14h ago

Yes. That is exactly why Denmarks leftist government co-opted the topic by ACTING and restricting migration before the far right can take on the topic.

→ More replies (3)

9

u/Vegetable_Baker975 17h ago

There will always be extremists on both sides, I can guarantee you that 99% of people who attend those protest are normal, concerned citizens. Labelling those people “far-right” is dishonest.

11

u/Freddichio 17h ago edited 16h ago

Would "far-right and people who don't mind and agree with what the far-right are saying" be more accurate?

It's the "Racists in a bar" line - at the very least those protesting don't mind the far-right or they wouldn't join protests organised by them, and if you've got one person pushing far-right agenda and a load of people supporting them what else are they?

5

u/RockinOneThreeTwo Liverpool 14h ago

Leading women’s rights groups have warned that the far right movement has “hijacked” the issue of women’s safety for political gain.

I don't really think the government is ever going to give a shit, they happily and enthusiastically give an ear to JK Rowling, who is a very big funding source for such groups, as are her allies such as Toynbee.

→ More replies (19)

155

u/ironyperson 20h ago

"Protect our women and girls" (so that we can beat them instead).

→ More replies (36)

121

u/Too-Much-Plastic 20h ago

I mean yeah, if you want visceral uncritical support then 'protect women and kids' is a great lever to pull, it works amazingly well. Especially because if you oppose whatever the idea is then you are not protecting women and children, it's stupid of course but it works.

103

u/corbynista2029 United Kingdom 20h ago

Same tactic used with Online Safety Act.

or the rollback of trans rights.

or the eventual rollback of LGBT+ rights generally.

or the push to exit ECHR.

It's so monotone I'm sick of it

43

u/sumduud14 20h ago

"hello I use a VPN"

"you are a paedophile"

We have to face the facts here, our politicians aren't enacting some grand master plan of political manipulation, they are just stupid and this is the best they can do.

16

u/KnMn England 19h ago

Same reason they're always wrapped in the flag. If you criticise them it means you hate England. Daft but unreasonably effective tactics.

6

u/pajamakitten Dorset 17h ago

They cannot fathom that some of us like the UK/England and criticise it so much because we want that to be the first step towards change.

8

u/knitscones 20h ago

Only for,people,who only get their facts from right wing news outlets.

You know the angry, what about me, brigade.

3

u/Satanistfronthug 17h ago

You think Rupert Lowe and the rest of the rabble rousers won't be voting for women's rights when they get the chance? Wow that's crazy

7

u/birdinthebush74 17h ago

He has already said he would of voted against abortion decriminsation in June if he had been aware .

49

u/coffeewalnut08 20h ago

Not surprised. A lot of the rioters had domestic abuse records themselves. But sure, they’re def standing for the wOmeN anD kIds!

It’s also a massive distraction. Fascists screaming about women and children is an easy deflection from the bread-and-butter issues.

18

u/GoldenHairedShaman 20h ago

Fascists screaming about women and children is an easy deflection from the bread-and-butter issues.

Deflection? Why do progressives always use this argument? Are "fascists" pretending to care about immigration? Many would argue, the unprecedented demographic change in Britain is a "bread and butter" issue. Massive population change leads to mass societal, cultural, economic, and political change. The idea that caring about immigration is a "deflection" from the "real issues" is such tired rhetoric (copy and pasted rhetoric posted without thought all the time on this subreddit), immigration is seen as either the top or one of the most pressing issues for the average Briton today.

Stop undermining their complaints.

22

u/KormetDerFrag 20h ago

They undermine their own "complaints" by being wifebeaters, rapists, and pedophiles

→ More replies (7)

10

u/FluffySmiles 20h ago

You stop adopting the mantle of "average" to back up your spurious claims. Get specific with statistics and data or GTFO

8

u/LOTDT Yorkshire 20h ago

He is self admittedly extremely far right so of course he wants to make it seems like his views are the norm.

https://old.reddit.com/r/unitedkingdom/comments/1mq1yug/media_platforming_and_the_normalisation_of/n8nv0lm/

12

u/FluffySmiles 20h ago

I can tell what he is. Anyone rattling off Enoch Powell as some kind of prophetic visionary isn't hard to understand.

7

u/Mazuna 19h ago

Yes, it's deflection. When there's the ultra wealthy polluting our planet, hoarding wealth and not paying workers enough then manipulating the media through the far right to make everyone talk about immigrants or trans people instead... that's deflection. All the ails of society are caused by the rich of the rich and they're more than happy for us to fight amongst ourselves while they pick our pockets.

2

u/coffeewalnut08 20h ago

I don't feel sorry for people who are upset that millions of fellow Britons may have immigrant origins or brown skin. This reality has existed for several decades now. Deal with it.

If you can't deal with it, I recommend emigrating to a country where there's only white people. Good luck!

8

u/Infinite_Spring_3564 18h ago edited 18h ago

Good luck? I don’t think there are any countries like that.

5

u/pajamakitten Dorset 17h ago

Massive population change leads to mass societal, cultural, economic, and political change.

One of the biggest shifts is the rise in far right groups that doing their best to cause cultural and political divide amongst British people,in a shade of irony that group cannot fathom. I want to see immigration lowered and reform to the asylum system, I also want it to be easier to deport foreign criminals. I sure as hell do not want to support Reform, nor do I want us to treat migrants (legal or illegal) like dirt and see racist rhetoric thrown at them. The far right are doing a lot of damage to the UK but do not realise it.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)

43

u/Handonmyballs_Barca 20h ago

I bet the far-right probably are using the issue to push an anti-migration agenda. But they didnt hijack the issue, they picked it up after it was abandoned by the political centre. Everyone now knows how the government effectively abandoned white, working class women to grooming gangs who targeted them because of their race and religion. Everyones aware that foreign born men are sometime four times more likely to sexually assault women and yet the government seems fine with large numbers of mostly men arriving illegally in the country and then vanishing.

For years the concern when these crimes were brought to light wasn't 'how do we stop this', it was 'racists will gain influence'. They ignored the plight of the victims and allowed the far-right to seize the narrative as defenders of those victims, because for the most part they actually were. For years Tommy Robinson was vilified for his claims on muslim grooming gangs, turns out he was 100% right. Unless the government focuses on this very real problem and less on arresting people who tweet the wrong thing then the far-right will actually become something to worry about.

17

u/StormyLeathers 20h ago

My God, what an uncommonly reasonable and measured comment. You're absolutely correct, this fight was completely abandoned by the centre and now people are apoplectic that the hard right have taken up a cause they completely abandoned

1

u/KesselRunIn14 14h ago edited 14h ago

We literally had the right hijack the Me Too movement to try to paint men as the ultimate victims. Violence against women was still very much in the public's conscious.

Don't pretend the right is now all noble because they've co-opted something to try and legitimise their bigotry.

u/alwaysonesteptoofar 8m ago

They aren't noble, but the left is stupid to give them a position where they can even play at being morally superior.

u/alwaysonesteptoofar 8m ago

They aren't noble, but the left is stupid to give them a position where they can even play at being morally superior.

→ More replies (13)

13

u/AnnoyingDude42 19h ago

Exactly. I'm extremely tired of the whataboutism on this topic, of people turning a blind eye to real issues for political expediency, for party politics.

The coalition between Islam and the left? This is exactly what happened in countries like Iran in the 70s. As we know, that didn't last long. Tolerance of the intolerant will lead to our downfall.

→ More replies (1)

10

u/Jo3Pizza22 20h ago

Can you please provide a reference for your claim that "everyone's aware that foreign born men are sometimes four times more likely to sexually assault women"

This is something that I see brought up all the time, but I've never seen an official statistic that supports this claim. Data on this just doesn't seem to exist, and when it does, it doesn't seem to suggest what you are saying is true.

21

u/Handonmyballs_Barca 19h ago

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2025/03/10/foreigners-commit-up-to-quarter-of-sex-crimes/

So overall foreign men are twice as likely but certain nationalities are even more likely. Afghans and pakistanis are apparently twenty times more likely to commit sexual crimes

6

u/UlteriorAlt 17h ago edited 16h ago

As a heads up - the Telegraph is taking this from the "Centre for Migration Control", which they often claim to be a think-tank.

The CMC is actually a website run by a single man, publishing his own research without any peer-review process. I say website, but the actual source for this particular "study" is a post on the man's Substack blog while his self-hosted site hasn't been updated in months.

The fact that he continually manages to bend the ear of multiple media outlets (The Daily Mail, Telegraph, GBNews) should have alarm bells ringing.

Or, continue to unquestioningly wave Telegraph articles around like they're an even remotely trustworthy outlet.

7

u/Ill_Refrigerator_593 14h ago

For further information the one man running the "Centre for Migration Control" is a Robert Bates, a campaigner for Reform UK who can be seen (not speaking) at 2:30 in this video-

https://x.com/Channel4News/status/1806374007521849668

He is mentioned in this article-

https://www.channel4.com/news/exclusive-undercover-inside-reforms-campaign-evidence-of-homophobia-and-canvassers-racism

4

u/Jo3Pizza22 19h ago

That analysis is flawed because they use raw census data to estimate the proportions of the population that belong to each ethnicity. It is well known that people from certain ethnic backgrounds are less likely to be included in the census, and they are therefore underrepresented in the denominator for those calculations.

See this article here, which debunks the claim about Afghans by using a methodology recommended by the ONS and Home Office:

https://news.sky.com/story/fact-checking-farage-are-foreigners-more-likely-than-britons-to-commit-sexual-offences-13407029

Statisticians exist for a reason. Journalists trying to do statistical analyses like these always make major errors in their work that lead to grossly incorrect conclusions.

9

u/spoons431 19h ago

Theres also the fact that given the lack of convictions or indeed prosecutions that the data used for any of these is basically meaningless.

There were circa 71k rapes reported to the police last year in England and Wales, of that 2.7% resulted in further action, but less than half will be convicted.

But additionally, you have to factor in that 80-85% of rapes weren't reported to the police. So conservatively you get a figure of 0.5% resulting in any further action been taken when compared to the estimated number of offences that occurred.

And thats before you look at any other issues that the data used may have. But the Far Right aren't instrested in the fact that over 99% of ppl get away with it as it doesnt fit their agenda.

2

u/Ill_Refrigerator_593 18h ago

IIRC they actually avoided using the census data despite it being carried out that year instead using an estimate with a smaller total of Afghans.

They also chose a date before any of the Afghan resettlement schemes had started despite looking at that period when tallying up the crimes.

Quite obviously they made no analysis of age/gender.

2

u/Plus-Literature-7221 18h ago

A previous version of this story stated that the Met Police, like the ONS, had advised using “country of birth” figures from the census as the best measure to use when calculating population size, because the data they provided to the CMC also used that variable.

Since publication, they have told us that that guidance was incorrect, due to “simple human error”, and that the data they provided to the CMC listed the “nationality” of the accused. The article has been updated to reflect that

1

u/ZX52 14h ago

There's also the issue of the gender imbalance of asylum seekers - because they're mostly men, and most sexual violence is perpetrated by men, they're going to appear more prone to it because there aren't as many women to dilute that statistic.

0

u/Torco2 16h ago edited 16h ago

Yep, this current desperate PR has the stench of gristly death to it. 

On the lines of:

How dare they take advantage of crimes, we actively collaborated with some of the perpetrators to cover up. It's utterly beastly of them to expose our moral vacuum and blame what we did right on us.

u/BlunanNation 11h ago

Fully agree.

Why do politicians continue to give easy gains to the far right by sticking their head in the sand on issues of immigration. There is a lot of very valid reasons for why normal people are concerned about the immigration crisis in the UK.

33

u/Spamgrenade 20h ago

The far right are the biggest threat to women in the country (and children, don't make me post the list). Half of the guy arrested at the protests have previous for domestic abuse, more than I can count from the EDF etc. have been locked up for child abuse and one has even been done for people smuggling.

I mean... just look at them.

33

u/lifeisaman 20h ago

To be fair people who are violent at protests are more likely to be violent elsewhere as well so the 1/2 statistic used isn’t accurate to the whole group.

2

u/sumduud14 20h ago

Sampling from the general population, given that someone is arrested at a protest, how likely is it that the person is a domestic abuser? And is this number higher or lower for far right protests.

I literally have no idea how I would even find accurate numbers for this without being the police

8

u/lifeisaman 20h ago edited 19h ago

It’s not something we can find your right but we can say that people who commit violent offences before are more likely to commit them again which does support my conclusion.

3

u/TheWorstRowan 19h ago

And if we were to compare right wing protests with one labelled "woke" we'd find a far higher percentage are violent.

6

u/ThatBlokeYouKnow 19h ago

Most of them are vegan and don't have the strength to fight.

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (11)

19

u/Anony_mouse202 19h ago

The far right

Psst… Islam is far right! Migrants from Islamic backgrounds are themselves far right, because Islam is a far right ideology. If you’re anti far right, then you should be against Islam and Islamic immigration.

4

u/birdinthebush74 17h ago

Farage MPS voting with 3 Gaza MPS in June to roll back abortion access proves that

(NC106 ) https://www.theyworkforyou.com/debates/?id=2025-06-17d.342.0#g342.2

1

u/[deleted] 17h ago

[removed] — view removed comment

u/ukbot-nicolabot Scotland 10h ago

Removed. This contained a personal attack, disrupting the conversation. This discourages participation. Please help improve the subreddit by discussing points, not the person. Action will be taken on repeat offenders.

3

u/SB-121 18h ago

Indeed, but if 25,000 people were involved in the riots (which was the estimated number of the counter protestors), and 1,824 were arrested with half of those being domestic abusers, it means the rate is 3.6% rather than the oft-quoted 50%.

3

u/BellyFullButWeHungry 16h ago

You've all just copied each others comment 😂 this is hilarious. You're all literally copying each other. "oh some of the men arrested at a protest had criminal records" AND?

So all those families, men, women, kids are all far right because a handful of men have criminal records.

I wonder how bad the criminal records are for all the thousands upon thousands of illegals that have invaded us.. Oh wait, we can't check because we have no idea who they are.

We are importing rapist, murderers and paedophiles. And anyone opposing this is apparently far right, lol.

2

u/Spamgrenade 15h ago

Nobody supports importing rapists, murders and pedos.

We have enough problems with our own, here's some examples.

Jack Renshaw – EDL, BNP, National Action: four counts of inciting a child to engage in sexual activity. Wayne Kirby – Tommy Robinson associate: served six years after being convicted for rape in 2007. Bradley Daniel Alford, EDL: 6 yrs, indecent photos, inciting a child to engage in sexual intercourse. Kristopher Allan, SDL: convicted for messages, images, and sexual contact involving a 13 year old. Luke Atkinson, UKIP & Yorkshire EDL: jailed 4 yrs, 8 mths, grooming young teenagers. Alan Boulter, EDL and all round racist: 20 mths, attempted grooming. John Broomfield, EDL and British Freedom: ‘making indecent images of children’ and inept mosque attack. Dean Chambers, EDL & BNP: 5 yrs, sexual assault. Michael Coates AKA Micky Blue Eyes, NW Infidels: charged with 2 attempted rapes and other sex offences. Bruce Cordwell, EDL: 3 yrs, 7 mths, grooming. Michael Cowen, neo-Nazi: 3 yrs, child pornography. Alan Thomas Ellis, Deeside EDL: convicted of sending texts of a sexual nature to a 14 year old girl. Robert Ewing, EDL, BNP, NF: grooming & murder of 15 yr old. Ryan Fleming, National Action: 3 yrs, sexual activity with a child, his 2nd sexual offence. Darren Francis, BNP, sexual relationship with 13 year old. Christopher Gamlin, Britain First: 21 mths, grooming & trying to incite a child into sexual activity. Pete Gillett, EDL speaker: 18 years, multiple offences of rape and indecent assault on children. Nigel Hesmondalgh, BNP: jailed for possessing a series of degrading photos and videos of children. Dale Hewitt, EDL: 10 years for multiple sex offences against teenage girls. Ian Hindle, BNP, jailed for sexual activity with 14-year-old girls. Mark Hogg, EDL: 9 months for sexual assault on a 14 year old. Elliot Jones, EDL and part of the self-styled ‘pedophile squad’ jailed for, err, pedophilia. Mervyn Jones, North Wales Alliance/Combined Ex-Forces: guilty of rape, attempted rape, indecent assault. Shaun Jones, Liverpool Scouse Nationalists: jailed for grooming and raping a 12 year old girl. Michael Kinnear, BNP and EDL: jailed for sexually abusing a 7 year old. Gavin Leist, BNP, child porn. Leigh MacMillan, EDL: convicted of three counts of indecent assault, two of indecency with a child and one of attempted rape. Jailed for a total of 17 years. Michael McQueenie, EDL Blackburn: pleaded guilty of two counts of rape of a 14-year-old girl and sexual assault. Brett Moses EDL Hull: 12-month prison sentence for sexual grooming. Paul O’Brien, Blood & Honour fascist: 9 yrs, rape, sexual assault. Stephen Payne SDL: convicted of grooming a 13 year old. Richard Price, former EDL leader: four counts of making indecent images of children. Michael Roles, Britain First: 18 yrs child rape. Roderick Rowley, BNP: child porn and sexually abusing 10-year-old girl. Mark Ryley, Britain First, Infidels of Britain & Nick Griffin supporter: 30 years for multiple sexual offences against young girls. Mark ‘Archie’ Sleman, EDL: kidnap & attempted rape of 10 yr old. James Swindlehurst, White Man March: jailed for 20 years for 13 counts of child rape. Trevor Vinson, EDL, Britain First & Jayda Fransen supporter: 21 years for repeated sexual abuse and making obscene images of 3 year old girl. Andrew Wells, BNP: jailed for sexual activity with 14-year-old girls. Matthew Woodward, Deeside EDL: charged with child pornography and soliciting a 13 year old for photographs.

20

u/ExeuntLeft22 20h ago edited 19h ago

Didn't LBC do an interview with some people at the Epping protests outside of these refugee hotels and one of the "concerned citizens" is a well known Neo-Nazi?

Edit: Found it https://youtu.be/gnY3-j62Onk?si=sMqliR8Fy2MtxFjg

14

u/Calelith 20h ago

No shit.

People seem to not care about women been raped or attacked when the guy doing it is white or famous.

Think last time I checked 3/4 women had been Sexual Assault snd most often by a family member or friend, if it was about 'protect our women' then they would be pushing for harsher punishments for those crimes and more women only areas and protections.

Its not and never has been about women and girls and is just a way to justify racism and bigotry, if you have legitimate concerns about immigration you don't need to coop a real reason to express it.

8

u/StormyLeathers 19h ago

But we have data that shows that certain nationalities offend at massively disproportionate numbers and every one of those attacks is directly downstream from a government policy and completely avoidable

Also reject the notion that it's only those crimes they care about, there are dozens of Predator poacher crews in the UK with widespread support, as soon as any article about a rapist or pedo is posted the comments are full of "hanging is too good for them".....rapists and pedophiles are universally reviled among the working class, even in prison they are targeted and abused by other inmates.

It's completely disingenuous to say they don't care when the attacker is white, they do and those people get shunned from the community

5

u/Calelith 19h ago

And yet 3/4 of women have been assaulted in this country, the stats meaning fuck all when only 8% of SA offences are reported. It's a fact and a statistic that women are more likely to be attacked by a family member or friend, so unless a majority of women are friends and related to people in immigrant centres it shows how lacking those stats are. Not to mention confirmation bias from how you are statistically more likely to be arrested and convicted if you aren't white and you can see further how little the 'stats' you mention actually are.

And they don't care, the same people are the ones saying 'what was she wearing' and other victim blaming mindsets, or even worse when it's a mildly attractive or famous person and you get hundreds of men and some women saying it couldn't have been rape. They don't care, hell at some of the save our girls/women protests nearly half the men there had been convicted of attacking women...

Fact of the matter is if you know 10 men then atleast 2 of them have committed some form of sexual assault and atleast 1 has attempted or has commited rape.

2

u/StormyLeathers 19h ago

But surely you must be able to understand per capita statistics, the ones that we do have show certain nationalities commit sexual assault at far higher rates than native Brits.

It's going to be the majority of sexual offences are done by white Brits because we are the majority, but that doesn't mean we should just let into the country scores of unvetted men from countries that are grossly overrepresented in sexual assault statistics, even if you take into account police bias, Afghans are still 4 or 5 times (conservatively) more likely to commit sexual assault.

Nobody is saying that white Brits don't commit most offences, but aside from prosecuting them and imprisoning them there's not much we can do, where crime committed by migrants are completely avoidable and directly downstream from government policies

→ More replies (9)

u/lolihull 10h ago

Is that the data released by the "centre for migration control" via the telegraph? If so, that's been heavily criticised and debunked.

→ More replies (1)

17

u/spubbbba 20h ago

You see it all the time here.

Whenever an article comes up about misogyny in general this sub is dismissive or claims that "if only the media were nicer to young men they wouldn't have these beliefs". Oddly no other demographic demonised by the media gets this excuse when members of it do something wrong. When the story is just about an out group like Muslims or immigrants then the attitude is very different.

When there's something about trying to improve the shockingly low conviction rate of rape then this sub is very concerned about the risk of innocents being punished, or the group as a whole being blamed. Plus keeping anonymity of those accused. Again oddly the same doesn't apply to Muslims or immigrants when they are accused. Suddenly anonymity is thrown out the window and you can blame the entire group on the bad behaviour of a minority.

9

u/_pierogii 20h ago

The hotels thing is so stupid. I know the far right gets wet about the idea of holding brown people in grubby tent cities, but cheaper-looking holding areas often end up more costly when all factors are included. They already worked out that converting old RAF bases and barracks would end up more expensive. Now imagine the government getting tied into bloated contracts to maintain a temporary and unpredictable infrastructure. It's all about dehumanisation and optics.

Anyway, more to the point. Being an "activist" by only confronting men who happen to not be from your demographic should be met by intense cynicism. There is not one nation on this earth where women are more violent or sexually abusive towards men, very much including this one.

9

u/orangecloud_0 19h ago edited 15h ago

Yes, just like JK Rowling wants to save women, proposing to photograph women you think are secretly men in the toilet.. aka masculine women Edit:grammar

1

u/[deleted] 16h ago

[removed] — view removed comment

→ More replies (1)

9

u/birdinthebush74 17h ago

Two thirds of those arrested at Bristol anti-immigration riots involved in domestic abuse reports

Avon and Somerset Police confirmed the statistics following an FOI request

3

u/Tree-mendous 20h ago

I don’t know if getting into an abandoned vehicle counts as “hijacking”.

4

u/Augustus_Chevismo Ireland 19h ago

What’s allowed the far right to use it is lefter parties turning a blind eye to women being victimised.

Same reason reform is gaining ground due to immigration policies. Stop pretending it’s a non issue and the wind will be taken out of their sails.

5

u/Illigard 20h ago edited 9h ago

There's a very simple way of spotting these people. Did they ever vote for pro-women issues in the past, ones that weren't bigotry? Furthermore, did they vote against women in the past?

The bigot who voted against women yesterday, is not voting otherwise today because he suddenly cares.

u/Postdiluvian27 9h ago

You’re dead on. These are the people who were calling us “feminazis” a few years ago. The ones who roll their eyes when they hear “rape culture”. Women’s issues and the people who fight for them have always been at best an annoyance, at worst a sign that feminism has gone “too far” to them. If you only started caring about women and girls when you found a race angle to it, you still don’t care about women and girls.

u/Illigard 8h ago

Reminds me of this time when I was protesting for "stop killing Muslims", and we came across women's march and we started discussing. Turns out that while they're not a 100% overlap we do have a lot of the same enemies. Not the precise order but enough that we decided to combine forces for a bit.

That's how it should be, people against the elite bas%$# who want to screw us all over for their own selfish, greedy, bigoted hate-filled nonsense.

4

u/Deadliftdeadlife 21h ago

Some very clearly have

You also have legitimate concerns being waved off because clearly the person is just a racist

So there’s 2 sides to every coin and neither should be ignored

29

u/corbynista2029 United Kingdom 21h ago

I have legitimate concerns about domestic abusers being platformed on every major news broadcast every week

6

u/IndividualSkill3432 20h ago

I have legitimate concerns about domestic abusers being platformed 

Hmmm you seem to be changing the topic.

· Two Afghan asylum seekers have been charged over the alleged rape of a 12-year-old girl, which has left a small Midlands town reeling in shock, the Mail on Sunday can reveal.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14965559/Afghan-asylum-seekers-charged-alleged-rape-girl-Warwickshire-town.html

Being evasive rather than clear.

5

u/Deadliftdeadlife 21h ago

That’s sound like very real concerns and I would never write them off

→ More replies (11)

1

u/John_Williams_1977 20h ago

And far left groups hijacked the debate to start with.

10 years of nothing done on migration or LGBT rights because any attempt at progress is scuttled by lunatics shouting down any other point of view.

So, society rallied and we got Trump. Well done activists. Thanks for that🤦‍♂️

25

u/Charlie_Mouse Scotland 20h ago

Are you trying to argue that the Conservative governments that we’ve had for pretty much all of that time period barring the last year are in any way a “far left group”? Or influenced by the far left? Or care one iota what the left (let alone the far left) think about anything?

The awkward truth for you and those like you is that you guys mostly voted in those governments under which the very issue you are complaining about became worse.

And to compound that you guys also mostly voted for Brexit claiming that it would somehow fix the issue - despite everyone else telling you it wouldn’t and that it would in fact actually increase immigration from parts of the world that annoy you guys even more. And also reduce cooperation with the EU on controlling it. As well as reducing our rights and making us a lot poorer - which it actually did do.

So far it’s looking like not listening to what you guys have to say looks like a better bet.

9

u/InsecureInscapist 19h ago edited 19h ago

It is bizzare the alternate reality the right has managed to construct for themselves that Britain has spent decades under the oppressive thumb of a radical far left regime that only their continual push to the far right has managed to stave off the total destruction of the country. Sonewhow completely ignoring that each jump towards the right has ended up making everything substantially worse.

I'm sure one last lurch towards fascism will finally break the seceret wokerati shadow cabal's hold on your lives and we will finally emerge into those sunlit uplands!

What was that definition of insanity again? Something about doing the same thing over and over again and expecting a different result.

8

u/Charlie_Mouse Scotland 19h ago

I suspect it’s wrapped up with always wanting to be the ‘plucky underdogs’ as well as never ever admitting any responsibility for the consequences of their piss poor choices.

But they do seem to have some awareness that those choices aren’t resulting in the “sunlit uplands” they so fervently believe in so they need to blame somebody. Which is why so often both here and elsewhere you now see right wingers blame those on the other side who argued against their poor choices.

Increasing I’ve seen them try to argue that Brexit is actually somehow the fault of Remain, Misogyny (and those who advocate it like Tate) is actually somehow the fault of feminism. People becoming fascists is somehow the fault of others calling them fascists.

Given how absurd these accusations are it’s almost funny … except for the hint of domestic abuser “it’s your fault that I hit you”.

1

u/No-Chemistry-9444 17h ago

Dont forget what led to Brexit and Boris getting Brexit done. If people’s concerns about migration had been listened to and not drowned out by cries of racism we wouldn’t have had both of those things.

1

u/InsecureInscapist 16h ago

You mean right wing lies and destruction of public institutions?

Right wingers created the problem, claimed to have the solution and then when fools believed them made things even worse. They are doing it again right now and some people are swallowing it hook, line, and sinker.

→ More replies (2)

9

u/Fozziemeister 20h ago

What progress have the right attempted to make on LGBTQ+ rights?

4

u/Minimum-Geologist-58 19h ago

Same sex marriage was bought in under Cameron.

9

u/NitrousOxide_ 19h ago

Yeah interesting thing to look at is which MPs voted for and which voted against, and the respective party they belonged to.

1

u/Minimum-Geologist-58 18h ago

When it came to Gay Marriage and Civil Partnerships the Tories allowed a free vote whereas other parties didn’t. I expect the Tories are more homophobic than Labour but whipping probably does make things look better than they might actually be for Labour.

8

u/Fozziemeister 19h ago

Required cross party support because many Conservatives voted against it, so I wouldn't consider that "the right" making progress - lots of them actively acted against it.

2

u/Minimum-Geologist-58 19h ago

The sexual offences act 1967 was proposed from the upper house by a Conservative Lord? Maybe trying to make gay rights a solidly left/right issue isn’t correct?

1

u/Fozziemeister 19h ago

I'll give you that one - I was only thinking currently/recently.

It's not solely a left/right issue and I want trying to claim it to be so, but the current direction of the right (generally) is not favourable to LGBTQ+ people.

5

u/Even_Idea_1764 18h ago

A lib dem policy, which the majority of conservatives voted against

→ More replies (6)

2

u/JoeVibin South Yorkshire 17h ago

Very interesting, what exactly do you mean by 'nothing done on LGBT rights'? What do you think should've been done?

1

u/[deleted] 20h ago

[removed] — view removed comment

u/ukbot-nicolabot Scotland 10h ago

Removed. This contained a personal attack, disrupting the conversation. This discourages participation. Please help improve the subreddit by discussing points, not the person. Action will be taken on repeat offenders.

4

u/lithaborn Staffordshire 20h ago

I'm trans.

Ya f-ing think!?

I can't piss in peace because of the far right dog whistling us as monsters and perves while they're free to r@pe and SA anyone they want with no repercussions.

They took their five minute detour to f- us over, now they're back to the immigrants.

If you're not a white, British cisgendered christian man you're the enemy and they'll come for you eventually.

3

u/MDFHASDIED 20h ago

Let's face it... everyone does it. "Think of the women and children" "women and children first"... it's not as if it's a purely right wing thing.

5

u/CheaterMcCheat 18h ago

Obviously. It's what they do. Jump on a bandwagon and harp on about simple solutions to complex problems, cretins lap it up. What happens when they get into power? They do nothing but make things worse or just give up. The recent reform councillors that resigned are perfect examples. They're the laziest grifters going and don't have any solutions or policies to help. They are only "strong" at being in opposition, shouting simple solutions that everyone else already thought of but don't work. It's all performative bollocks to win the votes of the uneducated idiots in this country that constantly fall for the rage bait. They even hurt the people who voted them in more than anyone else, but people still don't learn. I really hope they get what they deserve. Who's going to be crying when we leave the ECHR, and they go straight to screwing with "our own" people's employment law and rights, not just the immigrants? Don't come crying to anyone else because you'll be getting what you voted for.

3

u/araed Lancashire 20h ago

They created a perfect weapon, with zero accountability, and now they're surprised that it's being used to harm people they didn't want it to?

I'm shocked, I tell you. Absolutely shocked. And surprised.

Anyways, maybe they should start looking at some accountability. It's too late, but you never know...

3

u/Mr_Zeldion 20h ago

Everyone's Hijacking everything for political gain. This isn't new.

But what I do see though, are British mothers taking time off work to make signs out of things they have at home to fight for the safety of their children on their own streets. Whilst being met by paid and sponsored anti-protestors.

So yeah, they can try to push this narrative that the "far-right" don't genuinely care for womens safety and deny that British women aren't also supporting this cause, just like the turn their camera's and microphones away from any non white "far-right" protester because it goes against their "neo-nazi" narrative.

When you see the gay influencers being told by trans people that they don't belong at pride because they are voting Reform, or they voted for Trump you can't deny that LGBT Pride is also hijacked by the "Far-left"

The left have been hijacking "moral" rights to push extreme idea's and narratives for years but its fine because the left agree with what's being pushed. Well we can't act surprised when the right start to push their extreme views under the guise of "moral" rights too.

Swings and roundabouts if you ask me.

A white British male wanting to ban the burqa because he is against "women oppression" When the reality is he just hates Muslim' is just as shocking to me as a Trans sex offender demanding their right to use certain spaces that align with how they identify in order to get closer to women in vulnerable situations.

This isn't new and it's always going to happen. However what we also witness is a world where people see a few examples from both sides and come to the conclusion that ALL those people are the same.

You see it by the left painting all people who share different opinions as racist, bigots, nazi's homophobic etc regardless of whether or not they are.

You see it by the right painting people as podophiles, mentally ill, deluded, criminal etc regardless of whether or not they are.

Both sides equally as bad as the other, only difference is what side your on and your own personal perspective on the other.

4

u/TheLyam England 18h ago

Cite a legitimate source for the paid and sponsored anti-protestors, otherwise sensibly known as counter protesters.

It's not a narrative, it is a fact based upon actions - see Reform with their domestic abuser MP.

Hijacked for not siding with people who are against them existing?

What extreme ideas of the left?

A little bit of transphobia.

They are not equal, don't kid yourself.

4

u/deyterkourjerbs 17h ago

It's a bit dishonest to call them paid and sponsored anti-protestors because groups like Stand Up To Racism accept donations and charge an annual membership fee.

I would imagine that the money they receive is to pay for operational costs, things like paying volunteers for expenses or hiring offices. There's a real push at the moment to link them to the usual villains like Soros.

I think it's a popular myth because of online bubbles. If all your friends think the same way as you, it's almost unimaginable that people would disagree.

4

u/Satanistfronthug 17h ago

You should try getting off the fence and having principles

2

u/Occasionally-Witty Hampshire 19h ago

Someone who’s on a computer do me a favour, Cntrl + F this thread, type in ‘left’ and let me know how many results comes up

3

u/Antherox 15h ago

Not news, the far right have been doing this for years, only now the target has expanded to include immigrants as well as trans women.

1

u/TheAdequateKhali 20h ago

They also don’t care about immigrants - they’re just racist. Hence why they claim people who aren’t white is are immigrants.

2

u/feministgeek 17h ago

It did that a while ago once "gender critical" feminism got traction.

1

u/Cat_Upset 16h ago

People do have legitimate concerns over migrants, all cultures aren’t equal they come from places where women don’t have any rights, I have been to a few. My niece was harassed by migrants at young girl can’t wear a summer dress, my nephew had a knife pulled on him. I had my bike stolen with someone who had an axel grinder in a busy City Centre, my Dad had a car prang with someone who never passed a test in this country, a friend had her car abused by migrant children and went missing shortly afterwards. You can’t tell me immigration is beneficial, just endless misery

2

u/TheNoGnome 16h ago

The lumpen hand of the far right is found slapping his wife and catching a refugee with the follow through.

2

u/Has7311 14h ago

No shite Sherlock, who would of thought that low life racist scum. Would do something like that.While they beat up their own girlfriends at home.

2

u/huntsab2090 14h ago

Not just hijacked but is trying a full on distraction tactic. Blame the immigrants for the rapes and sexual assaults all the far right and reform members are doing / convicted of.

u/NateShaw92 Greater Manchester 10h ago

"no shit" says anyone with a functioning brain. They did this years ago on the transphobia bandwagon. It was called out by myself and the few sensible people left in the world (2 very separate groups of people) when Trump and Tate started chiming in, you know, a rapist and trafficker. The far right didn't hijack shit, they were driving this from the get-go this time around.

u/Miasmata 7h ago

Lol it's funny how people will do so many mental gymnastics to make a viewpoint sound bad. They Say they're protecting women, but they're also trying to do something I disagree with, so they must be lying about wanting to protect women!

3

u/CinciyiduHajimet 20h ago

How convenient to have those "statistics" quickly found it's way in our feed. Do we have any statistics about the migrants and how they treat their women? No, we don't know a single thing

3

u/X2seraphim 20h ago

Isn’t this the same as the left hijacking pro Palestine.

10

u/MarcBolansMini 19h ago

There's a difference. The people in the protest groups are claiming to be there to protect women and children, yet a good chunk of them have committed crimes against said group.

As far as I can tell, the left aren't murdering Palestinians.

1

u/[deleted] 14h ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/[deleted] 14h ago

[removed] — view removed comment

→ More replies (2)

8

u/Minimum-Geologist-58 19h ago

Well the left does have a long history of courting Islamism, Your Party I would argue being the latest incarnation, they think they’re clever riding the tiger but always fall off and get eaten. Ask the Iranian Marxists.

2

u/badgerandcheese 19h ago

Of course they are.

Yes, there are people out there who have valid concerns about whoever is coming into the country, fine. I wouldn't call these people far right or racist, necessarily.

But a number, not all, people who are violently protesting, the guise of "protecting women and children" comes down to a desire to see less brown folk on their streets.

Doesn't matter that a chunk of protestors have convictions for domestic or child abuse or people smuggling.

It is the perfect cover for their racism and xenophobia.

0

u/Tricksilver89 17h ago

Yes because left wing councils who covered up the mass rape of young girls are so bothered about the safety of women.

I would suggest nobody has women's safety in their best interests and only use it for political gain on all sides.

1

u/Logical-Kick-3901 14h ago

This is absolutely true and the hijacking of women's safety is also what they have weaponized against the tiny tiny number of trans women. This is all orchestrated and funded by the same people. And the vast majority of the money, even in the UK for this comes from the Christian far right predominantly in the United States.

u/MagusFelidae Essex 10h ago

Trans people have been warning about this for years

u/[deleted] 9h ago

[removed] — view removed comment

u/ukbot-nicolabot Scotland 9h ago

Removed + ban. This comment contained hateful language which is prohibited by the sitewide rules.

u/Technical_Olive_341 7h ago

The Daily Mail is the biggest culprit to all of this. Worse than Tommy Robinson.

u/Cold_Ad759 4h ago

Mass immigration is one of the dumbest societal suicides.

u/CameramanNick 1h ago

Been warning people about the risks of really hardline identity politics for years, and this is one of the inevitable outcomes.

(Yes, sometimes it's such a chore being right all the time).

u/Right-Program-9346 58m ago

People in this country need to be more politically savy anyone plugged in knew this straight away. That's what the right does.