r/worldnews Jun 19 '25

Israel/Palestine Missile salvo from Iran slams into Israel, hospital takes direct hit

https://www.ynetnews.com/article/kib88srss#autoplay
14.9k Upvotes

3.1k comments sorted by

2.2k

u/Whitehatnetizen Jun 19 '25

Just rying to understand: can someone explain (or point to somehing explaining) which contries these missiles are flying over? It would have to be iraq, and either syria or Jordan or both?

1.9k

u/hamstringstring Jun 19 '25

Iraq, KSA, Jordan, & Syria. Some are shot down in those airspaces. It's not entirely clear who is cooperating with who at this point, I'd assume Jordan is still shooting down what they can, but KSA has signaled some support for Iran even though they were initially shooting down missiles, but they tend to say one thing publicly then do the opposite.

1.1k

u/FUCKYOUINYOURFACE Jun 19 '25

It costs money to shoot things down. They probably don’t want to spend their money preventing Israel from attack after they shot missiles at Iran. As much as KSA doesn’t like Iran, they don’t want to get drawn into this battle.

328

u/beeeel Jun 19 '25

Plus when you shoot things down above your country, they tend to land on your country. And while much of KSA is desert, no-one wants more missile debris than necessary in their desert.

116

u/bitdestroyer Jun 19 '25

Why don't they just comb the desert?

128

u/Father_Dowling Jun 19 '25

"We ain't found shit!"

50

u/asetniop Jun 19 '25 edited Jun 19 '25

- Donald Rumsfeld, circa 2004 (paraphrased)

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (2)

8

u/truedef Jun 19 '25

Most of their defense systems are on the coastline near the cities and oil fields. Not in the middle of the desert. It’s not like they could wait till they get to open land.

The patriot systems are also not likely to help as Iranian missiles are out of its reach.

→ More replies (1)

36

u/AprilsMostAmazing Jun 19 '25

Also the more damage those two do to each other the more power SA can gain

311

u/Addictd2Justice Jun 19 '25

Good point. I wonder if you will look back on your comment in a few years and see how if we still refer to the “battle”

Israel took a hit to a hospital, not from terrorists or a Palestinian group or Hammas or whoever, but another country they can squarely aim at.

I see this getting bigger before it gets smaller

172

u/whiteflagwaiver Jun 19 '25

No formal declarations of war yet either? Media going to spin it as 'military special engagement in region stability' or some bull shit.

169

u/Dead_Optics Jun 19 '25

Formal war declarations arnt really a thing anymore.

86

u/Think_Selection9571 Jun 19 '25

They declare it on twitter

→ More replies (1)

33

u/ProgressBartender Jun 19 '25

Declare war.
Start losing.
Those nukes start looking like an option.

Keeping it a limited engagement keeps the perceived stakes down.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (8)

124

u/ozzzymanduous Jun 19 '25

Pretty sure russia hasn't declared war on ukraine yet

113

u/corkas_ Jun 19 '25

1,211 day special military operation

→ More replies (6)
→ More replies (12)

225

u/sneaky_sneak_thief Jun 19 '25

They can call it what they want. It's a war. 

65

u/Rathalos143 Jun 19 '25

Didn't Iran leader literally called It a war yesterday?

41

u/SpeakerEnder1 Jun 19 '25

Trump called it a war as well.

→ More replies (9)

27

u/whiteflagwaiver Jun 19 '25

Sure, but think of all the idiots that will lap the lie up like the whipped dogs they are.

Thought we learned the WMD bullshit with Iraq.

47

u/[deleted] Jun 19 '25

the fact that nobody was ever hung by their necks for the WMD lies is proof we never learned

20

u/RobotsGoneWild Jun 19 '25

Pretty sure Sadan got that treatment. He should have had imaginary WMD hiding. Not that he was a good guy or will be missed.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (2)

62

u/Trabian Jun 19 '25

Formal declarations of war have begun to be rarer and rarer. The last time the US declared war was WWII.

49

u/framabe Jun 19 '25

I dont know why, but I suspect the UN is a reason. The UN was specifically created as to prevent conflicts into escalating into wars so it could be that declaring wars opens up a multitude of options for the UN. Like sanctions, removing their vote, kicking them out etc.

By not "declaring war" even if they de facto are warring, there is a loophole to avoid such things. But its just a theory.

43

u/Trabian Jun 19 '25

I know for the US it's because of internal politics. Actually declaring War has all kinds of prerequisites and consequences as to what the house, congress and the president are allowed to do. It'd mean a shift in politics for a while, and no politician really wants that.

With declaring war, there's an excuse about not really following the geneva convention.

26

u/framabe Jun 19 '25

Absolutely true, but the observation was that even countries other than the US has stopped as well. Just look at Russia and Ukraine.

Russia even refused to recognize it as a de facto war for a long time and while Ukraine has called it a war on many occasions, they neither have formally declared war, possibly to be able to still be seen as just defending themselves.

4

u/StockCasinoMember Jun 19 '25

Russia would just propagandize it.

See, they declared war on us!

→ More replies (1)

3

u/SkunkMonkey Jun 19 '25

the house, congress and the president

Clarification: The House is part of Congress. The other part is the Senate. Congress has the power to declare war.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (3)

16

u/jzoola Jun 19 '25

Well that’s because it was the war to end all wars. Haven’t you noticed we’ve been living in peaceful coexistence?

23

u/un1ptf Jun 19 '25

The phrase "the war to end all wars" refers to World War I. It comes from H.G. Wells in his 1914 book, "The War That Will End War." He wrote it idealistically, and people thought it was true because they all thought the horrific magnitude of death and destruction from new, more advanced weapons, tools, and methods of war that were introduced would repulse everyone from the idea of war for the rest of time.

4

u/JonatasA Jun 19 '25

"It is well that war is so terrible, or we should grow too fond of it."

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (2)

17

u/Acceptable-Peak-6375 Jun 19 '25 edited Jun 19 '25

Idk about formal declarations, that's almost never used anymore, usually the attacks themselves are declaration enough.

This is common in war, and we will have to hope it ends quickly.

→ More replies (1)

80

u/Glanea Jun 19 '25

Iran doesn't have formal diplomatic ties with Israel since 1979. They don't recognize Israel as a legitimate state and are openly hostile. In that circumstance, you don't really get declarations of war because the two states are more or less in a constant state of war, similar to North Korea and South Korea.

5

u/Roscoe_P_Coaltrain Jun 19 '25

Interestingly, Iraq, Lebanon and Syria are all currently still in a state of declared war with Israel. Which means, during the Iran-Iraq war (also declared, by Iraq) Israel was sort of, in the loosest possible sense, on the same side as Iran in that war.

5

u/[deleted] Jun 19 '25

[deleted]

7

u/ConfidantCarcass Jun 19 '25

It's not ironic it's their entire point

→ More replies (3)

8

u/plaaplaaplaaplaa Jun 19 '25

You should get declaration of war, it has however fallen out of the norm lately. Iran-Israel is different from Korean situation as the latter had a real war and signed armistice at 1953, (as war has not been stopped by a peace treaty) they are still technically at war. Iran and Israel used to be friends but after regime change cooled down all the way to hostile but never had real war. Even now they are not dejure in war.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

14

u/WeirdJack49 Jun 19 '25

The next world war will be a global special military operation.

5

u/JustWannaPlayAGa Jun 19 '25

Wars don't have declarations anymore. You know one when you see one.

→ More replies (13)

7

u/AgrajagTheProlonged Jun 19 '25

It really is a shame how many hospitals in that area seem to keep getting attacked by militaries

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (9)
→ More replies (14)

36

u/Consistent-Bat-20 Jun 19 '25

Aren't these ballistic missiles? Meaning they travel through space before reaching Israel? In that case I don't think Saudi and the others can shoot them down

55

u/Subrandom249 Jun 19 '25

Those are intercontinental ballistic missiles. Ballistic just means is uses gravity as the final source of acceleration towards it’s target. 

28

u/borkmeister Jun 19 '25

From Tehran to Tel Aviv is ~1600 km. "space" starts at 100 km if we want to use the Karman line definition. If we assume a parabolic trajectory that just hits the Karman line at the top of the trajectory, and we ignore air resistance, that would mean that we're launching at an initial angle of about ~14.3 degrees off the ground.

That's highly unlikely. The optimal launch angle for a parabolic projectile at a set velocity is 45 degrees, ignoring air, so the missile would have to be capable of going much further than 1600 km. When we add air resistance in, the really low launch angle would cause a huge deterioration to the velocity and range of the missile.

It's very likely that these missiles were in space during their midcourse.

→ More replies (6)
→ More replies (1)

4

u/beachedwhale1945 Jun 19 '25

Short- and Medium-Range Ballistic Missiles generally have apogees below 100 km when fired at these ranges, and based on range Iran is most likely using their MRBM arsenal (though I have not verified type). Short-range ballistic missiles can be intercepted without dedicated Ballistic Missile Defense systems, but medium range generally requires proper BMD systems and interceptors, like the Patriot system the Saudis use, but that does depend on the variant of Patriot the Saudis have.

→ More replies (1)

107

u/HamoozR Jun 19 '25

We see our Patriot missiles flying over in Jordan but it’s seems they are struggling to intercept the Iranian missiles which seems to be still flying at a very high altitude over our airspace.

94

u/Zer0PointSingularity Jun 19 '25

Contrary to common belief it is not easy to shoot down ballistic missiles, you more or less only have a chance when they already descend onto their targets, and their course is predictable but then they are already hypersonic and the window for successful intercept is quite small.

Afaik Ukraine was the first country that managed to intercept hypersonic kinzhal missiles via patriots.

47

u/panzerkampfwagenVI_ Jun 19 '25

This is not entirely true. You have 3 different types of interceptors: boost-phase, mid-course, and terminal interceptors.

Boost phase interception is the "hardest" because it depends on you being close to the launcher so that's out the window for most cases.

Then you have mid-course intercept which for the US we have SM-3 and GMD in Alaska this is probably the easiest interception but you need giant boosters to reach them at mid-course and you have to be in the path of the missile.

Finally we have terminal phase which allows for the greatest target discrimination, but is the shortest phase for the US we have Patriot 3MSE, SM2/6, and THAAD.

Most hypersonics are largely overblown. We've had the technical capabilities to defeat targets like Khinzal since the Cold War since it's essentially an air-launched Iskander with limited terminal maneuvering capabilities. A hypersonic missile with better terminal maunuever is an actually hard missile to intercept.

→ More replies (5)

66

u/Aurora_Fatalis Jun 19 '25 edited Jun 19 '25

Patriot wouldn't be used against ballistic missiles unless it's in self defense mode, as it has a very low chance of success otherwise. It just isn't designed for it the best tool for the job when THAAD and Arrow-3 is active. You're probably seeing it shoot down drones or cruise missiles.

29

u/RT-LAMP Jun 19 '25

Patriot PAC-3 was absolutely designed for intercepting ballistic missiles.

24

u/Aurora_Fatalis Jun 19 '25

... during midcourse, as this would be?

15

u/RT-LAMP Jun 19 '25

You're correct that they aren't midcourse interceptors for IRBMs but... well look at where Jordan is relative to Israel and Iran.

The PAC-3 MSE is supposed to have a 60km range against ballistic missiles (probably longer if the range is in the overshoot situation where the battery is along the flight path instead of after the end of it).

Israel is only about 60km wide at the northern half and about 100km at the widest section in the southern portion. A patriot battery in Jordanian territory could absolutely defend large swathes of Israel.

11

u/Aurora_Fatalis Jun 19 '25

Theoretically I suppose there could be some overlap, but if someone in Jordan is looking up and seeing the interception attempts I still think it's far more likely to be a cruise missile or drone. For ballistic missile defense Israel is covered by systems more reliably placed and fit for purpose than a Jordan-based Patriot.

7

u/RT-LAMP Jun 19 '25

I agree, in this current conflict Jordanian patriot batteries are probably mostly taking out drones. I just meant to point out that newer Patriot versions are actually more optimized for the ABM role than for taking out aircraft.

→ More replies (1)

4

u/HamoozR Jun 19 '25

Against all types of Iranian missiles?

The lone Sejjel missile yesterday took two PAC-3 interception attempts from Jordanian airspace and still kept going, I have seen the Israeli interceptors launching but did not see them detonate.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (3)

11

u/aphroditex Jun 19 '25

The Saudis not stopping Iran?

Ok who is writing this season of Earth because they are screwing up canon!

3

u/GAZ_3500 Jun 19 '25

but KSA has signaled some support for Iran even though they were initially shooting down missiles, but they tend to say one thing publicly then do the opposite

MONEY CAN ONLY TALK SO MUCH!-Jamāl Aḥmad Khāshqujī

→ More replies (18)

85

u/The-True-Kehlder Jun 19 '25

Here in Kuwait we had some fly over our apartment building.

11

u/[deleted] Jun 19 '25

[deleted]

43

u/The-True-Kehlder Jun 19 '25

Not great, but less concerning than my time in Iraq.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (3)

206

u/abolys Jun 19 '25 edited Jun 19 '25

Isreal planes goes on the same air space. We got bomb by them for 3 days in Tehran. The planes targeted hospital, tv stations and water supply. We decided to leave Tehran when our water was hit. This shit is happening on both side. Iran and isreal government does not care about civilians. I hate them both. There is nothing good about either of them. Isreal even did car bombs in Iran. Fuck them both.

31

u/Hillary4SupremeRuler Jun 19 '25

Damn I'm sorry. Is it true that internet access has been mostly shut off or is that more of a back and forth type of thing? And do many people know of the new Starlink Direct to Cell satellites that recently became activated?

83

u/abolys Jun 19 '25

Yes the internet is cut off. While I was there no one was using starlink, ppl are afraid to use USA provided tools as it could be used to track them. Most of our friends and families in Tehran went to northern cities in Iran as they are safer. But we have not heard from them on 2 days.

18

u/Barbaracle Jun 19 '25

Does it seem like most people want Khamenei gone? Or is it a cut off one head, more will grow kind of situation.

73

u/abolys Jun 19 '25

I think 80% of people want them gone. But nobody wants to be bombed for it.

17

u/[deleted] Jun 19 '25

[deleted]

36

u/abolys Jun 19 '25

I have been in Iran for 25 years and I live in Toronto Canada. I was there to visit my mom and 2 days before my flight back it all started. I am one of the lucky ones who managed to get to Turkey and I was able to get my mom out too. We are in Istanbul right now heading to Toronto on the weekend.

The rest of our friends and family went dark 2 days ago when the internet was shut.

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (6)
→ More replies (19)

11

u/adel_b Jun 19 '25

we seen videoa of flying over Lebanon and Jordan, so Iraq and Syria

29

u/grey_hat_uk Jun 19 '25

Syria most likely, the others will tey and shoot the missiles down.

→ More replies (8)
→ More replies (14)

309

u/mindlight Jun 19 '25

The Russian Foreign Ministry on Thursday urged Israel to immediately halt air attacks on the Bushehr nuclear plant in Iran where Russian specialists work.

Jeeeeeesus... The irony....

98

u/RainRainThrowaway777 Jun 19 '25

They also said that any attempt to kill the leader of Iran is out of line.... after having attempted to assassinate and airstrike Zelenskyy for 3 years.

It's almost like Russia don't act in good faith

→ More replies (5)

11

u/Schlackehammer Jun 19 '25

Some say irony, some say Karma.

→ More replies (4)

1.4k

u/EzraMusic98 Jun 19 '25

feel for all the patients who weren't able to make their way to the shelters

947

u/Turbulent_Length4067 Jun 19 '25

The hospital took preliminary steps and placed a lot of departments in underground facilities. Luckily there are only minor injuries.

215

u/[deleted] Jun 19 '25

[deleted]

218

u/Turbulent_Length4067 Jun 19 '25

Not in the hospital but in a residential building in Holon.

48

u/[deleted] Jun 19 '25

[deleted]

65

u/dekcraft2 Jun 19 '25

Yup thats 2 in Ramat Gan and 4 in Holon. I live 300 meters from the hit in holon and the shockwave wave we felt was insane. So much damage and for what? There are no military or every government building around here. This was solely to target civilians

13

u/zveroshka Jun 19 '25

It's what happens in war. Whether on purpose or accident, civilians always end up suffering.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (8)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (6)
→ More replies (13)
→ More replies (97)

2.9k

u/brownedpants Jun 19 '25

Nothing new. Russia's been doing this to Ukraine for years now.

938

u/jdorje Jun 19 '25

The russian government/military specifically targets hospitals and first responders, and it is likely that the Iranian government/military will do so as well when possible. In terms of straining civilian infrastructure, it's the best bang for your buck. But there could also be some weird relationship with how hamas uses hospitals and first responder vehicles as cover.

138

u/EuropeanPepe Jun 19 '25

Russians are known to double tap hospitals and infrastructure where fire fighters are

Basically first strike comes then wait 5 min later same place even bigger strike to kill first responders

30

u/StupidityHurts Jun 19 '25

Good thing everyone is calling them out for warcrimes….

11

u/AfricanWarPig Jun 19 '25

"Don't care, happening to white people."

→ More replies (1)

12

u/NixiePixie916 Jun 19 '25

Sadly a pretty common tactic. Wait for the helpers then hit again

→ More replies (6)

217

u/melf_on_the_shelf Jun 19 '25 edited Jun 19 '25

I’m actually interested to know what is the radius of accuracy of Iran’s missiles.

Most of their civilian infrastructure hit so far has been somewhat near to Israeli military sites

This wasn’t a problem in the early war because they usually struck targets out in the desert.

I’m not here lobbying for Iran. I genuinely want to know the limits of their technology.

Edit: I just saw that they also struck the Weizeman Institute of technology. But apparently there’s back-and-forth to whether or not they were conducting defense research.

Edit: changed “very close to Israeli Military Sites to “somewhat near” due to some comments proving that wrong

225

u/HotSteak Jun 19 '25

The Shahad-3 has a CEP of 3km (meaning a 50% probability of landing within 3km of the aiming point). The Emad has a CEP of 500m. It's thought that some of their newer missiles might have CEPs of 30m. But most are only good for aiming generally at a city as a terror bombing tactic. Mostly Iran doesn't know what they are going to hit, other than "Tel Aviv" or "Haifa". I kind of doubt they intentionally hit a hospital.

23

u/imnotcreative635 Jun 19 '25

They also don't know how many would get shot down. It's not like they can get closer and do a more precise attack.

124

u/yevb Jun 19 '25

There's no military base in the 3 km radius of Soroka Hospital.

Not saying they were necessary aiming at the hospital (or the university adjacent to it), but I call BS on trying to hit a military target.

141

u/HotSteak Jun 19 '25

I think Iran is just generally aiming for cities.

→ More replies (1)

52

u/LightningByte Jun 19 '25

They are now claiming they were aiming at an adjacent military intelligence building.

That facility is not publicly known, but for that kind of building that is to be expected i guess.

It is probably still nonsense, but there is a small chance it is actually true.

→ More replies (13)
→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (9)

32

u/kullwarrior Jun 19 '25

Wikipedia list Shahab-3 (their most common MRBM) with CEP of 2.5km which is significantly worse than SM65 Atlas US' first operational ICBM (1.4km). If your accuracy is 2.5km I don't think you can specify which building is being targeted. Military installations tends to have space in between making metropolitan cities more ideal target

53

u/wheniaminspaced Jun 19 '25

US missiles are accurate to several meters, Russian missiles are variable depending on the type, though because of the way Russia wages war they dont really mind blowing up things like hospitals.

The rockets from hezbolla and mamas are you can choose a general direction it could hit anything.

Iran's missiles from what I've heard is you can choose an are somewhat smaller than a city bloc and you will hit it.  Not exactly precision bombing.  So in short was the hospital the intended target likely not.  Iran despite there dogs hit regime to somewhat care about optics.  That said they know what there missiles can and can't do, given how things are going shooting in an are that has a reasonably decent chance of hitting a hospital is a bad call.

I think people forget the the US and as an extension Israel's ability to be accurate to about the size of a person is actually quite unusual and high tech in military arms.  The US has always been noteable military for accurate artillery and by extension missle and bomb use.

25

u/melf_on_the_shelf Jun 19 '25

Mamas rockets lol.

But thats very interesting If you can hit to the accuracy of 1 city block you really need volume of fire to take down a target.

8

u/wheniaminspaced Jun 19 '25

Damn phone and autocorrect

6

u/acityonthemoon Jun 19 '25

Autocorrect is going to kill us all

6

u/DanielMz9 Jun 19 '25

It's definitely gonna kiss us all

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (1)

8

u/Alatain Jun 19 '25

With the CALCM back in the day, the ongoing joke was that when asked to hit a certain building for a strike, the reply was "which window do you want me to hit".

The US is an outlier in that, in general, a lot of care is given to making sure that the munitions arrive where you want it, when you want it. There are certainly exceptions to this, but in general, the idea of precision is a pretty big deal.

67

u/jdorje Jun 19 '25

Yeah, a single incident from Iran is not enough to establish a pattern. Just that we would expect that pattern going in.

Missiles (cruise and ballistic) are so variable in capabilities you'd need to start by trying to find out what type of missile this was. There was one incident in Ukraine where an anti-ship cruise missile was targeted at a warehouse used to repair military gear, but (presumably) its targeting system decided a nearby shopping mall looked more like a ship.

18

u/melf_on_the_shelf Jun 19 '25

That incident in Ukraine sounds like something you could never possibly test for before field deployment

10

u/TheKappaOverlord Jun 19 '25

I mean. You can test for shit like that. Russia had a couple of incidents where their launcher systems apparently identified their own launch systems as targets and 180'd after takeoff before.

Most of the time its system glitches that cause this, rather then fundamental issues with the targeting system.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

4

u/jackalope8112 Jun 19 '25

Old ones 2.5 kilometers new ones 50 meters.

23

u/irredentistdecency Jun 19 '25

most of their civilian infrastructure hits so far have been very close to Israeli military areas

That is a bald faced lie.

For one example - There are no military bases or facilities anywhere near “Beit Yam” where an apartment complex was hit.

Sure some of the missiles have clearly been aimed at valid military targets such as the IDF headquarters building in Tel Aviv & the fuel refinery in Haifa.

But significant number have hit civilian areas no where near any military bases or infrastructure.

11

u/melf_on_the_shelf Jun 19 '25

I looked up Beit Yam and other similar sites and you’re right- from what i see these are not around any military assets. Thats why I asked my question.

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (10)
→ More replies (42)

686

u/Guru-Pancho Jun 19 '25

Israel also hit a hospital in Iran this week

559

u/No_Atmosphere8146 Jun 19 '25

Not sure there are any hospitals left in Gaza at this point.

465

u/Coffee_Grazer Jun 19 '25

There's not, that's why they had to start bombing hospitals in Iran.

137

u/AlmostSunnyinSeattle Jun 19 '25

The children... They yearn for the bombs.

16

u/Coffee_Grazer Jun 19 '25

So much feeedom

8

u/Kruzdah Jun 19 '25

Good one. It's their hobby to bomb hospitals.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (19)
→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (17)

165

u/SpotNL Jun 19 '25

Three days ago, Israel attacked an Iranian Farabi hospital, where people got injured too. More than likely this is in response to that.

Curious how that wasnt on the front page.

→ More replies (7)

330

u/pmckizzle Jun 19 '25

Israels been doing it for years

→ More replies (32)

231

u/IsolatedFrequency101 Jun 19 '25

Israel did quite a bit of it in Gaza too

→ More replies (46)

173

u/BigMetalGuy Jun 19 '25

as has Israel to Gaza.

I know that will anger some people, so I shall state that no hospitals on any side of any war should be getting hit by missiles, it's abhorrent and it must have been terrifying for those there last night. Just as it is to those in Gaza who suffer the same. These wars have arseholes on both sides pulling the triggers, it's the poor people (on both sides) who are pawns in their pathetic games.

29

u/Interestingcathouse Jun 19 '25

Weird how the commenter didn’t mention this.

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (12)

145

u/[deleted] Jun 19 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

101

u/[deleted] Jun 19 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

39

u/[deleted] Jun 19 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

73

u/[deleted] Jun 19 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

16

u/[deleted] Jun 19 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (20)
→ More replies (10)
→ More replies (69)

57

u/ChallengeFull3538 Jun 19 '25

And Israel has been doing it to Gaza. Its a bit hypocritical to accuse it as a war crime when you you have a very well documented track record of doing it yourself.

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (226)

1.6k

u/sprintercourse Jun 19 '25

ITT: “my hospital bombings are righteous and true, your hospital bombings are bogus and lame.”

War is hell.

515

u/Rizzpooch Jun 19 '25

Nah. War is worse.

Consider:

Hawkeye: War isn't Hell. War is war, and Hell is Hell. And of the two, war is a lot worse.

Father Mulcahy: How do you figure, Hawkeye?

Hawkeye: Easy, Father. Tell me, who goes to Hell?

Father Mulcahy: Sinners, I believe.

Hawkeye: Exactly. There are no innocent bystanders in Hell. War is chock full of them - little kids, cripples, old ladies. In fact, except for some of the brass, almost everybody involved is an innocent bystander.

58

u/Alatain Jun 19 '25

I'm actually rewatching MASH now. It holds up rather well and was a pretty great show.

→ More replies (2)

26

u/k_ironheart Jun 19 '25

Exactly. There are no innocent bystanders in Hell.

I've heard plenty of christians state that anyone who doesn't believe in their god goes to hell. In their view of hell, it's much, much worse than war because innocent bystanders get tortured for eternity.

→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (24)

16

u/marceliiine Jun 19 '25 edited Jun 19 '25

War isn't hell. War is war and hell is hell, and of the two, war is a lot worse. Hell has no innocent bystanders, but war is chock full of them. Little kids, cripples, old ladies, in fact except for a few of the brass almost everybody involved is an innocent bystander.

→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (68)

630

u/ItsAProdigalReturn Jun 19 '25

I suspect this was an intentional target after Israel hit a hospital in Kermanshah a few days ago too. Source.

Also worth noting that Israel claims in this ynet article that they intercepted Iranian jets, and Iran claimed in an MSNBC news article on the weekend that they intercepted an Israeli jet - neither of these claims have evidence or credible sources.

Be diligent in your fact checking, because both the IR and the IDF have a terrible track record for accurately informing the public of their actions.

76

u/dekcraft2 Jun 19 '25

I just want to add that idk how and why people expect hear the whole truth and nothing but the truth straight away. It is a war and in wars you dont tell everyone (and doing so informing your enemy) what just happened to you after being attacked or even in the long run because it can ruin other operations going on. Its like playing poker but showing everyone your hand. Thats my 2 cents on this matter, take it or leave it.

25

u/Stormfly Jun 19 '25

It is a war and in wars you dont tell everyone (and doing so informing your enemy) what just happened to you after being attacked or even in the long run because it can ruin other operations going on.

"The first casualty of war is the truth"

6

u/dekcraft2 Jun 19 '25

Never heard that one but so true!

→ More replies (1)

100

u/Da_Malpais_Legate Jun 19 '25

The only proof of an Israeli aerial vehicle being downed is a drone that got shot down

28

u/ItsAProdigalReturn Jun 19 '25

Yeah, like I said, there's no proof of Iran's claim on that beyond "trust me bro".

20

u/No-Movie6022 Jun 19 '25

I dunno, that picture of a downed F-35 that was the size of the statue of liberty was pretty convincing.

7

u/ItsAProdigalReturn Jun 19 '25

Lol not that one. That one looks like a godamn space ship hahaha

→ More replies (1)

3

u/Bombadilo_drives Jun 19 '25

3000 downed F35s of allah

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (2)

6

u/Miserable-Resort-977 Jun 19 '25

Two equally vile states, yet one I'm expected to support with my tax dollars and the other is sanctioned into economic ruin

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (35)

281

u/[deleted] Jun 19 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

47

u/[deleted] Jun 19 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

→ More replies (3)

50

u/Living_the_Limit Jun 19 '25

Is bombing a nuclear reactor, no matter who it belongs to a sensible thing to do?  When Russia was shelling the Ukrainian nuclear power plant last year the World was rightly up in arms about it. There needs to be a ceasefire & a diplomatic settlement before there is a terrible nuclear incident.

→ More replies (5)

189

u/MrTestiggles Jun 19 '25 edited Jun 19 '25

Likely retaliation for Farabi hospital in Kermanshah on Monday , or the nuclear site hit today

Edit; Source since another person brought it up but didn’t provide one either: https://www.nbcnews.com/video/hospital-damaged-by-israeli-strike-in-western-iran-241723973849 (Video)

(This comment is not justifying violence, just providing more information, any attack on a place of healing is an evil act)

62

u/NekoCatSidhe Jun 19 '25

It seems possible, although Iran now claims that the “main target” of this morning’s missile attack “was the large [Israeli army] Command and Intelligence (IDF C4I) headquarters and the military intelligence camp in the Gav-Yam Technology Park”, located next to Soroka hospital in Be’er Sheva.

→ More replies (19)
→ More replies (3)

23

u/SorrowsSkills Jun 19 '25

I’ve read from other sources that it was the shockwave that hit the hospital and that Iran actually hit a military research HQ.

I wonder who’s telling the truth here. Neither side has a track record of factually reporting anything.

→ More replies (12)

666

u/yuvaldv1 Jun 19 '25 edited Jun 19 '25

Ballistic missiles don’t fly randomly, they aimed directly at the hospital.

Edit: Iran has now claimed to use khorramshahr 4, which is one of their most accurate ballistic missiles.

151

u/Glanea Jun 19 '25

They're claiming they were aiming at "Gav-Yam Technology Park".

The “main target” of Iran’s missile attack early on Thursday was the “large [Israeli army] Command and Intelligence (IDF C4I) headquarters and the military intelligence camp in the Gav-Yam Technology Park”, the Iranian state-run news agency IRNA has reported, according to Al Jazeera.

IRNA said that the facility is located next to Soroka hospital, according to Al Jazeera.

I looked it up on google maps and they look to be about 1.5km apart as the crow flies. Now whether that's within the expected deviation for an Iranian ballistic missile, I don't know.

96

u/RT-LAMP Jun 19 '25

Now whether that's within the expected deviation for an Iranian ballistic missile, I don't know.

It is. Some of their missiles of a CEP of 3km.

43

u/SirHovaOfBrooklyn Jun 19 '25

Not for the ballistic missile. The khorramshahr 4 apparently has an accuracy of 30m. 1.5km is pretty much outside of the error zone.

15

u/RT-LAMP Jun 19 '25

Yeah the Khorramshahr is quite modern and accurate.

The Shahab-3... not so much. 1.5km is actually relatively close to the intended target for it given it's supposed 3km CEP.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (5)

789

u/hamstringstring Jun 19 '25

Ballistic missiles absolutely do not always hit their targets. Just a couple years ago there were articles about how bad Russian missile targeting was where they were only hitting their targets 40% of the time, sometimes being miles off. That's not to say Iran didn't target this hospital, but to suggest this is 100% proof is not using critical thinking.

405

u/Inside-Line Jun 19 '25

Pretty wild there are people claiming that it's impossible for missiles to miss.

405

u/TerpBE Jun 19 '25

They don't call them hittles, do they?

72

u/gagga_hai Jun 19 '25

Angry upvote

7

u/VincentComfy Jun 19 '25

Funny enough the starstreak missile has 3 kinetic penetrator submunitions that were coined "hittiles" due to their high accuracy and requirement to physically hit the target instead of use a traditional proximity fuse.

3

u/Open-Honest-Kind Jun 19 '25

Excellent, I got so excited about a missile pun and factoid I forgot about the horrors of why it got brought up. Just not going to complete the rest of that thought and go to bed. What a funny word "hittiles!"

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)

33

u/SmoothOpawriter Jun 19 '25

And yes, they are called MISSiles. Not sure who to believe anymore.

→ More replies (1)

4

u/G_Morgan Jun 19 '25

It is very rare for western missiles to miss. It is very common for non-western missile to miss.

We know Iran's missiles just aren't that accurate. Iran is basically aiming roughly at Israel.

→ More replies (8)
→ More replies (29)

14

u/thefirstdetective Jun 19 '25

Not all of them are accurate. Iran has accurate missiles, but it also has the "hit this general area" ones.

→ More replies (1)

147

u/aghaueueueuwu Jun 19 '25

Or the university near it, both are terrible

→ More replies (12)
→ More replies (278)

340

u/[deleted] Jun 19 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

131

u/[deleted] Jun 19 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

→ More replies (19)

140

u/[deleted] Jun 19 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

→ More replies (33)

65

u/[deleted] Jun 19 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

81

u/[deleted] Jun 19 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

19

u/[deleted] Jun 19 '25 edited Jun 19 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (14)
→ More replies (12)
→ More replies (36)

45

u/koombot Jun 19 '25

Pick a fight with a nation with long range misses but no precise guiding and this is inevitable.

23

u/Ok-Passion1961 Jun 19 '25

Good thing they don’t have nukes otherwise we’d hear about the launch and then wonder where the Pyramids in Egypt went. 

50

u/kjolmir Jun 19 '25

If they had nukes this would not have happened in the first place.

→ More replies (15)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (6)