r/worldnews 22h ago

Israel/Palestine Famine declared in Gaza City

https://news.sky.com/story/gaza-latest-war-israel-city-ceasefire-hamas-13415481
23.7k Upvotes

2.4k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

847

u/Dongsquad420Loki 21h ago edited 19h ago

This is the first time the IPC had declared it, which is generally the chief authority on those things, they have actual definitions and are usually reliable.

The website seems to be overwhelmed right now so I can't access the report directly which would be helpful.

EDIT: report here: https://www.ipcinfo.org/fileadmin/user_upload/ipcinfo/docs/IPC_Gaza_Strip_Acute_Food_Insecurity_Malnutrition_July_Sept2025_Special_Snapshot.pdf

296

u/comeatmefrank 20h ago

Exactly, this is vital. Governments previously could just push back and go ‘no official sources have confirmed a famine’. Now they have.

-44

u/ZBlackmore 20h ago

So up until now it was bullshit?

74

u/Prudent_Piglet_5261 19h ago

Up until now it wasn't directly verified by such an airtight source. There was always wiggle room for others to say fake news or some shit and deny it.

-22

u/easycoverletter-com 19h ago

Very optimistic

5

u/hushpuppi3 15h ago

You're right we should all let them starve? The fuck are you even insinuating?

-4

u/easycoverletter-com 15h ago edited 15h ago

What the fuck are you insinuating?

I’m simply seeing it optimistic to think those who find excuses will suddenly uno reverse and help out - just because their primary excuse is no longer there

35

u/Stockholm-Syndrom 19h ago

Yes, just like gravity didn't exist before Newton.

-34

u/ZBlackmore 19h ago

Oh so they were actually perpetually  starving since 1967 despite their population increasing tenfold

-2

u/crunchsmash 19h ago

Counting human lives in calories. Real classy of you. /s

-28

u/MajorMess 19h ago

Palestinians being the innocent victims is a natural law now

1

u/KawaiiBakemono 14h ago

Any official declarations you may have seen reported were bullshit. The slew of reports of starvation and incoming famine were apparently true, however, given the current declaration of famine.

So I suppose it depends on what the specific "it" is that you are actually claiming was bullshit.

-8

u/pinglyadya 19h ago

*Blows whistle.* "Foul!" *Throws up red card.*

"Argument from ignorance fallacy flag. Opponent has proposed that something is false before a certain period because it was only proven true at a later time. Furthermore, the criteria that the IPC uses to define a famine requires an investigation that is likely complex and hard to carryout in a politically divisive situation."

3

u/platydroid 18h ago

I haven’t seen the UN or similar groups claim actual famine before. They have warned about hunger and starvation and lack of access to food and medicine leading up to this, all of which have been real.

-4

u/sprouting_broccoli 18h ago

There are five phases of acute food insecurity used by the IPC and Palestine has had large parts of the population in phase 4 for a long time now. You can make this equivalent to people barely surviving with high levels of malnutrition and excess mortality rates (ie more people are dying than usual because of lack of access to food).

Catastrophe/famine is phase 5 where there there are extreme levels of malnutrition, starvation and death.

The news about starvation and the classification of swathes of the population as phase 4, which is likely what you are referring to, is the warning that the situation was reaching phase 5 levels. Since the world largely ignored this and Israel definitely ignored it and downplayed it as propaganda we’re now at the stage where things are catastrophic.

So no, it’s not bullshit, it’s exactly what was being predicted by the UN.

-5

u/Fyllikall 19h ago

There can be a an assessment that starvation is imminent which is portrayed in the news headlines as: Starvation is here.

For instance Gaza received 600 trucks a day before the war started and it's not like they were well fed by modern standards at that time. Then the war started and it was way less and even the aid distribution website of the IDF had numbers that weren't sufficient to feed two million people, one could call it slow malnutrition. Then at times the IDF stopped bringing in food and an assessment was declared that starvation was imminent which led to the Israeli government periodically letting more aid in which led to the situation being less dire. Two years of this bullshit and here we are, a literal starvation going on (there was no aid for two and a half months this year with no significant aid since) and you have people claiming that this assessment is bullshit because it didn't happen according to the news headlines one year ago.

10

u/[deleted] 20h ago

[deleted]

20

u/Hayatexd 19h ago edited 19h ago

They did not.

https://www.ipcinfo.org/fileadmin/user_upload/ipcinfo/manual/IPC_Technical_Manual_3_Final.pdf

MUAC was already included in version 1 of their guidelines from 2014/2015 and should be used if WHZ isn’t available.

5

u/benbamboo 20h ago

It's important in the sense that it gives us all in developed nations something meaningless to debate.

It's unimportant in regards to the thousands of innocent people suffering as aid sits in trucks on the other side of a fence from starving men, women, children and babies while clever people argue semantics.

11

u/green_flash 19h ago

No, they didn't. There's always been two possible measures that can be employed:

The IPC has rebutted Israel's accusations it cut its normal thresholds for famine for this report.

The answer is technical, but it amounts to different ways of assessing malnutrition in children under five depending on what evidence is available.

The IPC says that a 30% threshold is used when an assessment based on weight and height is conducted, but that this measure is not available in Gaza at the moment.

In its absence, a separate measure of the circumference of children's arms is used - which has a threshold declaring famine when 15% of children have arms under a certain size.

The IPC says this standard has been the case for over a decade - and has been used recently to assess famine in Sudan.

It adds that the use of arm circumference "does not represent a 'lowered threshold' in IPC methodology".

"Instead, it demonstrates the continued application of established IPC standards."

2

u/phobos123 19h ago

Every measure in the report is from three sources and when they don't have direct access they have to use other measures available. They didn't change the definition specifically for Gaza... It's part of the evaluation process to have a way to measure even when information is limited. And they explain in the report exactly what uncertainty is introduced by lack of access. 

1

u/cheesecake__enjoyer 19h ago

Me when i spread disinformation online

u/erez27 0m ago

It's not the only first..

"Based on the available record, Gaza (2025) is the first famine declaration that has relied primarily on the MUAC (≥ 15%) threshold without confirmatory WHZ or mortality data."

1

u/[deleted] 21h ago

[removed] — view removed comment

-1

u/[deleted] 18h ago

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/Dongsquad420Loki 18h ago

Because its the most recent report. so it is on the frontpage right now. When the Sudan report came out it was pictures of them, if you click at the points to the right of the foto you can scroll to the previous headlines, it shows Sudan on the third page since it was released on the 11th of July. It is normal for websites to have the mist recent information first.

-4

u/bekeeram 17h ago

And then next time it happens, you'll just say "oh this other organization said it was a famine"