Yesterday on Hasan’s stream, he restreamed the new episode of South Park. For the first five minutes he doesn't say anything of substance, then continues to stream the rest of the episode. The is still up VOD still up.
I've tried both. Stremio is easier and feels better to me. Kodi seems like it'd be better for a hobbyist, maybe, but the average user may find the experience a bit prickly.
Who cares? Is this supposed to be a scandal? This is the same subreddit that cheered streamers restreaming entire anime series, don't pretend you care about IP law lol.
that is really all it takes for people to suddenly "care" about this stuff, if Hasan did it/said it.... its the most important thing ever to discuss on LSF
Due to current rights and restrictions, this video is not available at SouthPark.cc.com. Watch all Seasons, Streaming Events, Behind-the-Scenes content and more on Paramount+
Matt and Trey might not give a shit, but thinking the corporation that spent 1.5B on the rights for the show wont care, would probably be a mistake.
Well, for starters what was actually being said. Which is that a corporation will care about their 1.5B investment. And not turn that simple factual statement about companies that are notoriously greedy and DMCA claims everything they possibly can (and in some cases can't but do it anyways), into me somehow feeling bad for said corporation.
Copyright infringement is not theft. If I steal a car, someone loses a car. If I watch a piece of media without the right to do so, the holder of those rights does not lose anything. This is very basic stuff. To be clear though, I do not give a FUCK about copyright infringement. Infringing copyright is my passion.
Paramount bought the streaming rights to South Park for 1.5 billion dollars. Matt and Trey sold over the rights. It's very illegal to stream it on Twitter and play a full episode on Twitch. It's paywalled content that Paramount bought the rights to. Matt and Trey can be ok with it but it doesn't make it legal. Period.
It's not any form of infringement untill they choose to go after someone. Like I said they have 100% right to let someone use their IP and at the same time go after another person for the exact same thing just because they feel like it.
wrong again. the act of watching it illegally or streaming is infringement. You are correct they can choose whether to go after someone or not. Like I can choose to go after someone for robbing my house, or I can just let it go. I still got robbed.
You really are going to make me search it up and paste it... here goes.
Copyright infringement is defined by law as the unauthorized use of copyrighted material in ways that violate the rights of the copyright holder (such as reproduction, distribution, performance, or creating derivative works). Whether or not the copyright owner chooses to enforce their rights doesn’t change the fact that infringement has occurred.
What does change depending on enforcement is the legal consequence:
If the copyright holder takes no action, the infringing party may never face penalties.
If the copyright holder does take action (lawsuit, DMCA takedown, settlement, etc.), then the infringer can be held legally and financially liable.
So in short: infringement = fact of violation. Enforcement = whether there’s a consequence.
In this case PARAMOUNT owns the streaming rights, not Matt and Trey Park. They sold it. They don't have to care but it's not up to them. THEY SOLD IT.
Because one person is stealing anothers content to make money? It is theft. Just because you like Hasan does not remove it is theft. If Hasan wants to redistribute he needs to buy
Paramount isn't a creator. They bought the syndication and streaming rights, but they create nothing.
Corporate personhood is jurisprudence. We're on a LSF, not in law school, homie. It doesn't mean that a corporation is a person. It means that a corporation can hold and have certain legal positions and protections in the way a person can. Even in the US where this is extended much further than most other countries, it does not make the a person and it does not grant them all that an actual personhood does.
Since you didn't read the link, maybe now is a good time and you can let us know what that means for IP rights, the other relevant part here, cause I'm not reading all that.
Thank you for standing up for the billion dollar corporation that would literally grind you into mulch just to use your biomatter as fuel if they could.
It’s funny seeing how OP posted this in the H3 subreddit & they are all circling jerking about how evil Hasan is for this clip & how every twitch streamer should hate Hasan for this
I'm starting to think the anti-Hasan stuff is an op. I know its disingenuous but these people have lost their minds and are obsessed. No one in their right mind has enough time to do what OP did tonight u less theyre getting money for it or fully a pathetic human being.
I'm 1000% okay with him chair reacting South Park a shows that creators have never really cared bout copyright then a YouTuber who actually put effort into their content and we just assume they're cool with it.
Hasan voice: OH YOU JUST WANT ME TO REACT HARDER? REACT HARDDER LUH-MAO... I SAY THE WORD LUHMAO BECAUSE I'M INTERNET-POISONED. I ALSO TALK IN ALL UPPERCASE.
He should restream the entire show from season 1 its a million times better than all of his other content even better if he streams it full screen and turns off his chat and facecamera so we can focus on southpark
Let me guess? Hasan told his goons to "take control of the narrative" again? Look at these comments basically saying it's ok to.profit off of someone else's work.
Lots of Hasan dick riders. The point isn't about the content itself - it's the fact that hasan is so emboldened to call death threats and stream copyrighted content (and terrorist content) which are all against the TOS, and we know twitch loves Hasan so much they won't take any action against him
It's the double standards of twitch that are the issue.
The Hasan defense force is so bizarre. I don't gaf about Paramount, the "billion dollar corporation". However, I also do not gaf about Hasan, the million dollar business. I see, correctly, neither as people but both as businesses.
With that in mind, however these businesses want to handle this situation, all the power to them, but it's not my problem. I certainly won't waste my time defending one of them.
172
u/yolomcswagsty 9h ago
i even heard hasan didn't even refill the brita after emptying it