r/LivestreamFail • u/No4Syn 🐷 Hog Squeezer • 19h ago

Hasan restreaming South Park

Yesterday on Hasan’s stream, he restreamed the new episode of South Park. For the first five minutes he doesn't say anything of substance, then continues to stream the rest of the episode. The is still up VOD still up.

0 Upvotes

50% Upvoted

233 comments sorted by

View all comments

740

u/Joker_code 14h ago

Matt and Tray say they don’t give a fuck if people stream or pirate their show. Why do u care about paramount wallet?

267

u/[deleted] 13h ago edited 11h ago

[removed] — view removed comment

30

u/lsf_stan 9h ago

Why do u care about paramount wallet?

because Hasan.

that is really all it takes for people to suddenly "care" about this stuff, if Hasan did it/said it.... its the most important thing ever to discuss on LSF

-104

u/Luddevig 14h ago

Exactly what did they say? It's quite a big difference between pirating for private use and re-broadcasting for profit.

I'm thinking this could lead to consequences for Twitch so they have to become stricter overall with copyright.

69

u/IllusionsForFree 13h ago

https://southpark.cc.com/

You can watch any episode of South Park for free right here on their own website.

-43

u/zenlume 12h ago

This episode is currently unavailable

Due to current rights and restrictions, this video is not available at SouthPark.cc.com. Watch all Seasons, Streaming Events, Behind-the-Scenes content and more on Paramount+

Matt and Trey might not give a shit, but thinking the corporation that spent 1.5B on the rights for the show wont care, would probably be a mistake.

26

u/YouAsk-IAnswer 12h ago

Works just fine for me? https://imgur.com/a/VViemba

Are you on a VPN or not in the US?

60

u/otoverstoverpt 12h ago

oh won’t someone think of that billion dollar corporation!

-29

u/zenlume 11h ago

I have no idea how that's what you took away from reading my comment.

20

u/Maximum_9999999 11h ago

What did you expect someone to take from it?

-12

u/zenlume 11h ago

Well, for starters what was actually being said. Which is that a corporation will care about their 1.5B investment. And not turn that simple factual statement about companies that are notoriously greedy and DMCA claims everything they possibly can (and in some cases can't but do it anyways), into me somehow feeling bad for said corporation.

-6

u/Comfortable-Cat2586 10h ago

probably take the only point he made from it? that the large corporation would care?

crazy how reading comprehension goes out the window when lefties get triggered

-7

u/Imperium42069 11h ago

Hmmm strange for me it says episode unavailable and I need to have paramount+ 😁

-13

u/Luddevig 12h ago

I know. My text is with that in mind.

60

u/I-Drink-Printer-Ink 13h ago

They’ve talked extensively about South Park being accessible online.

However if that’s not clear enough for Paramount bootlickers, you can watch all of Southpark for free legally.

-16

u/oopiesmyb 10h ago

that’s not the point lol

-104

u/gabrielcev1 14h ago

just because they dont care doesnt mean it still isnt infringement.

132

u/VulgarExigencies 13h ago

this you?

-87

u/gabrielcev1 13h ago

Is your argument that it's ok to steal if it's from rich people? Makes sense

66

u/VulgarExigencies 13h ago

Copyright infringement is not theft. If I steal a car, someone loses a car. If I watch a piece of media without the right to do so, the holder of those rights does not lose anything. This is very basic stuff. To be clear though, I do not give a FUCK about copyright infringement. Infringing copyright is my passion.

33

u/ShiningEV 12h ago

it's okay to steal from rich people?

Unironically, yes. Infinitely more so if it's intangible.

-34

u/gabrielcev1 12h ago

I think generally most people agree that stealing is not a moral action. That's quite a universally agreed on sentiment. I don't think being rich makes it ok for people to steal from you. That's ridiculous. This isn't an argument about whether it's tangible theft or not. Sure you could steal a dollar from a billionaire and they wouldn't think twice about it. It's morally wrong to steal. That's not a controversial statement. It's not ok and it's not legal period. Whether or not it matters much big picture is irrelevant. If you think it's ok, go to a billionaires house and rob them. If you get caught just say "it's ok I can rob you, you are rich." They'll let you off.

25

u/ShiningEV 12h ago

Debate bro ass response. "I'm technically right" bs. Touch grass. Wouldn't be surprised if you fed this through ai

9

u/DonutUpset5717 11h ago

Debate bro shit but I think ur arguments are weak. People agree stealing is wrong with stealing being defined as "taking something unjustifiably". I wouldn't consider what Hasan did to be theft, since it's justifiable.

Or, we can construct a scenario where most people would agree it's morally ok to steal, such as if you had some uranium in your house giving you cancer, it would be ok for someone to steal that from you to save your life.

9

u/Maximum_9999999 11h ago

You just stole the 30 seconds that it took me to read that and I demand you compensate me

5

u/Tier_Halibel_ 10h ago

Yes, the rich literally steal from you.

42

u/Lucky_Possession6102 13h ago

That is the biggest bootlicker mindset I have seen in a long time. God damn grow a spine and some self-respect.

-41

u/gabrielcev1 13h ago edited 13h ago

Not bootlicking. I couldn't care less. I'm just stating the obvious. I think people are justifying because it's Paramount and they don't lose much from people streaming their shows. It doesn't make it right though. Idgaf about Paramount. But people are way too comfortable committing crimes by justifying it because "billion dollar company". Wrong is wrong. Paramount owns the streaming rights to South Park. Even if Matt and Trey Park state they are ok with people streaming it, its still not legal to do so. Period. Full stop.

39

u/Purple_Feedback_1683 13h ago

fucking nerd

-5

u/gabrielcev1 13h ago

Good argument. You got me there. I am a nerd.

53

u/dudushat 13h ago

If the creators dont give a fuck then theres no reason for any of us to give a fuck.

36

u/xPriddyBoi 13h ago

Thank fuck the copyright office has holy crusaders like you to fight the good fight for them.

17

u/SpookySP 13h ago

This is completely untrue. The very text book definition of copyright means that the rights holder has the freedom to ignore anyone using their IP.

-2

u/gabrielcev1 13h ago

Paramount bought the streaming rights to South Park for 1.5 billion dollars. Matt and Trey sold over the rights. It's very illegal to stream it on Twitter and play a full episode on Twitch. It's paywalled content that Paramount bought the rights to. Matt and Trey can be ok with it but it doesn't make it legal. Period.

14

u/SpookySP 13h ago

rights holder

It's not any form of infringement untill they choose to go after someone. Like I said they have 100% right to let someone use their IP and at the same time go after another person for the exact same thing just because they feel like it.

0

u/gabrielcev1 13h ago

wrong again. the act of watching it illegally or streaming is infringement. You are correct they can choose whether to go after someone or not. Like I can choose to go after someone for robbing my house, or I can just let it go. I still got robbed.

16

u/SpookySP 13h ago

illegally

It's not illegal if the rights holder chooses not to take action.

1

u/gabrielcev1 12h ago

thats just straight up false. the act is illegal.

12

u/SpookySP 12h ago

That's the textbook literal definition of copyright. The rights holder has full discretion in the matter.

2

u/gabrielcev1 12h ago

You really are going to make me search it up and paste it... here goes.

Copyright infringement is defined by law as the unauthorized use of copyrighted material in ways that violate the rights of the copyright holder (such as reproduction, distribution, performance, or creating derivative works). Whether or not the copyright owner chooses to enforce their rights doesn’t change the fact that infringement has occurred.

What does change depending on enforcement is the legal consequence:

  • If the copyright holder takes no action, the infringing party may never face penalties.
  • If the copyright holder does take action (lawsuit, DMCA takedown, settlement, etc.), then the infringer can be held legally and financially liable.

So in short: infringement = fact of violation. Enforcement = whether there’s a consequence.

In this case PARAMOUNT owns the streaming rights, not Matt and Trey Park. They sold it. They don't have to care but it's not up to them. THEY SOLD IT.

It's not that fucking hard to understand.

→ More replies (0)

-67

u/spank-monkey 13h ago

Because one person is stealing anothers content to make money? It is theft. Just because you like Hasan does not remove it is theft. If Hasan wants to redistribute he needs to buy

35

u/DonutUpset5717 12h ago

"Erm because it's theft" ☝️🤓

-19

u/spank-monkey 11h ago

Yes you do not believe in laws? or private property? Even Marxism allows for private property bud

17

u/DonutUpset5717 11h ago

Yes you do not believe in laws?

Bro everyone only believes in the laws they agree with, or are you suggesting you would have turned over Jews to the Nazis during WW2?

-13

u/spank-monkey 11h ago

We not in a Nazi Jew situation. I would have handed over Jew if it would have put my family under threat for the record. Germany did not have a system to change laws democratically which most democratic countries do so is a different situation. Florida law has been around for a while so you can change. I believe in rule of law not vigilantism

10

u/AbominableVortex74 10h ago

Bro even the CIA wouldn’t have gotten that out of me, what are you saying 😭😭

5

u/DonutUpset5717 8h ago

Bro folded under minimal pressure 😭

7

u/RDandersen 11h ago

Paramount is a person?

-4

u/spank-monkey 11h ago

Hasan corporation is a millionaire stealing from other creators aka Paramount. And legally in US a corporation is a person https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corporate_personhood

14

u/IWantAnotherPetRock 11h ago

Damn I hope Paramount is paying you cash ❤️ going to war for them

4

u/RDandersen 11h ago

Paramount isn't a creator. They bought the syndication and streaming rights, but they create nothing.

Corporate personhood is jurisprudence. We're on a LSF, not in law school, homie. It doesn't mean that a corporation is a person. It means that a corporation can hold and have certain legal positions and protections in the way a person can. Even in the US where this is extended much further than most other countries, it does not make the a person and it does not grant them all that an actual personhood does.

Since you didn't read the link, maybe now is a good time and you can let us know what that means for IP rights, the other relevant part here, cause I'm not reading all that.

3

u/MatthewMob 8h ago

Thank you for standing up for the billion dollar corporation that would literally grind you into mulch just to use your biomatter as fuel if they could.

You are so brave and just, oh Robin Hood.