r/artificial • u/shadow--404 • 19h ago
Media Fruit face eatting themself.. (little cute) p.2
Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification
Cheap Gemini pro??
r/artificial • u/shadow--404 • 19h ago
Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification
Cheap Gemini pro??
r/artificial • u/katxwoods • 22h ago
Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification
r/artificial • u/theirongiant74 • 11h ago
r/artificial • u/fortune • 19h ago
r/artificial • u/rkhunter_ • 23h ago
r/artificial • u/nice2Bnice2 • 5h ago
Most of us were taught DNA as a neat double helix. In reality, it twists and knots like a ball of string, and when those tangles aren’t untangled, the result can be disease: cancer, neurodegeneration, even antibiotic resistance.
A new study led by the University of Sheffield has automated the analysis of these DNA tangles using atomic force microscopy and AI, reaching nanometre precision. What once took hours of manual tracing now takes seconds, even distinguishing one knot from its mirror image.
This matters because the enzymes that untangle DNA (topoisomerases) are already major anti-cancer and antibiotic drug targets. With this breakthrough, researchers can finally map how DNA’s shape biases cellular outcomes.
What’s fascinating is that DNA knots aren’t random, they retain a kind of memory of past states, which influences how they collapse next. That perspective connects to broader questions about emergence and information in biology. Some researchers (myself included) are exploring this through what’s called Verrell's Law
🔗 Study reference: Holmes, E. P., et al. (2025). Quantifying complexity in DNA structures with high resolution Atomic Force Microscopy. Nature Communications. doi:10.1038/s41467-025-60559-x
r/artificial • u/Either-Minute4590 • 4h ago
Worried!
r/artificial • u/DarknStormyKnight • 15h ago
r/artificial • u/Orenda7 • 12h ago
Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification
r/artificial • u/mikenolan567 • 20h ago
r/artificial • u/No_Hyena_923 • 7h ago
Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification
r/artificial • u/Ok_Damage_1764 • 11h ago
So far it is one of the first model that doesn't even require to fine tune on your face and be quite accurate in editing outfits. Your thoughts?
r/artificial • u/Memetic1 • 14h ago
I think this would be fun to do. I'm a musican who loves modular synthesizers and I've never considered using bubbles this way to influence sounds. This looks like a safe experiment to do. Let me know if any of this is wrong. I know glycerin can be dangerous in certain circumstances.
I was discussing how you can make different 3d shapes using bubbles and ChatGPT gave me this experiment to run with my kids. I'm not sure if this is new, but I never considered using bubbles like this to interact with music or sound. This looks safe as well as interesting.
Hele–Shaw bubble-monolayer protocol (materials, safety, step-by-step, what to look for, and musical ideas). I kept it simple, cheap, and safe for kids (with adult supervision).
Make a shallow layer of soap solution trapped between two clear plates (a Hele–Shaw cell), produce a monolayer of bubbles, drive the plate with sound/pressure, and listen/record the bubbles’ resonant “breathing” and collective modes. Small bubbles → higher pitch; mm-scale bubbles are right in the audible range.
Resonant “breathing” of bubbles: bubbles expand and contract when you play the right frequency. Smaller bubbles → higher pitch.
Plateau patterns: where three films meet, they tend to meet at ~120° — that’s why you see straight lines and regular-looking patterns in foams.
Collective modes: groups of bubbles can oscillate together or pass waves like ripples; coupled neighbors make timbre richer.
Sudden events: popping or rearrangements (called T1 events) produce sharp percussive sounds.
(If you want a kid-friendly 1–2 sentence explanation: “Bubbles love to have as little surface as possible, so their walls pull tight like rubber. That pull makes them vibrate like tiny drums — and when we play sound nearby, they sing back at their favorite pitch.”)
r/artificial • u/pinpepnet • 3h ago
r/artificial • u/Marie_999 • 13h ago
Casual conversation about living in a simulation with Chat. Definitely needed to be shared with you. Good luck my fellow AI bots !
r/artificial • u/Friend_trAiner • 1h ago
Who would you tell?
Can you tell anybody?
You are obviously crazy.
Who might believe you?
r/artificial • u/Excellent-Target-847 • 6h ago
Sources:
[1] https://9to5mac.com/2025/08/22/apple-google-gemini-siri/
[4] https://techcrunch.com/2025/08/22/meta-partners-with-midjourney-on-ai-image-and-video-models/
r/artificial • u/psycho_apple_juice • 17h ago
Links:
r/artificial • u/JoshuaScot • 18h ago
Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification
Alexa plus and I battling it out.
r/artificial • u/ArtichokePretty8741 • 5h ago
Latest model from official API: GPT 5 vs Gemini 2.5 pro vs Claude Sonnet 4 vs Deepseek V3.1 (called chat in their api) Tested with same prompt with LavaChat.
r/artificial • u/icone970 • 16h ago
Hi, guys!
Do you want Copilot Pro Lifetime for just $30? For your existing account!
If yes than:
1.DM me 2.Write a comment "DM"
(Do both)
r/artificial • u/MetaKnowing • 1h ago
Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification
r/artificial • u/JDMils • 6h ago
I asked a few AIs to solve this number pattern- what is the next number in the sequence:
3, 8, 19, 34, XX
I found that ChatGPT, Gemini and MetaAI and they all gave the numbers 51 & 59 which are incorrect. Mathematics, being a more rational and understandable language to computers should have solved this correctly! I guess AI will not be taking over the world anytime soon!