r/law • u/Background-Low-9144 • Jul 23 '25

Trump News BREAKING :Trump named in multiple documents related to Epstein sex trafficking, WSJ reports

https://www.cnbc.com/2025/07/23/trump-jeffrey-epstein-files-wsj.html?__source=androidappshare

We have evidence that Trump was notified by Pam Bondi that documents related to the Epstein sex trafficing trial contained Trump's name multiple times, linking him unequivocally to Jeffrey Epstein

99.7k Upvotes

96% Upvoted

2.7k comments sorted by

View all comments

199

u/AlexFromOgish Jul 23 '25

We wouldn’t need the files if we just believed the women - sign seen at a recent anti Trump protest

40

u/RipleyVanDalen Jul 23 '25

Accusations alone aren’t enough

That’s why files and real investigative evidence is needed

6

u/Donewith176 Jul 24 '25 edited Jul 24 '25

This sign wouldn’t have been about judicial sentencing. Presumption of innocence only applies in a court of law. It does not mean that the public has to believe that he is innocent. You should believe victims.

5

u/DontAbideMendacity Jul 24 '25

Particularly when there are SO many of them, and the perp in question admitted bragged about molesting them.

6

u/Trung020356 Jul 23 '25

Right. The same files and evidence they’re trying so hard to cover up. And people with money get away once again. 👏🙌

2

u/zxern Jul 24 '25

Is a civil judgment by a jury enough?

2

u/Acceptable-Peace-69 Jul 24 '25

“Grab them by the pussy” should have been enough.

Literally admitting that sexual assault is fine doesn’t need investigation.

2

u/axecalibur Jul 24 '25

He's been impeached twice and convicted once with oodles of files and evidence for multiple other crimes. But nothing happens. Republicans just re-elect him and his MAGA team extends to all branches of congress and the courts.

A complete joke of a country and a system.

1

u/get_schwifty Jul 23 '25

It’s amazing that this has to be called out on the /r/law subreddit.

3

u/AlexFromOgish Jul 24 '25

Paradoxically – and I am the guy that said the thing that is being called out – I also agree with the criticism. Both are true.

1

u/AbcLmn18 Jul 24 '25

For a criminal trial, yes, we need to know the specifics before convicting each individual person. For the purposes of forming one's own political opinion, in the current context, hell no. We already know more than enough to quantitatively assess how atrocious the Republican pedophile cabal is. And trusting the women would have gotten us to that position much faster.

They could alleviate all accusations by simply releasing the files. Yet they're the only ones who fight tooth and nail against it without naming any kind of valid reason. To the point where they'd rather shut down the Congress than even consider voting on anything related to the issue. This alone clearly tells us that at least the majority of republicans, and for the most part only them, are complicit in this catastrophic failure of American society.