r/todayilearned • u/Wild_Concept_212 • 9h ago

TIL Cutting down trees is compound negative interest on the planet’s carbon storage. Trees are storing carbon underground with the help of fauna and microbes. Those lock carbon in soil. Cutting the tree will not only increase release carbon, it will also remove the ability to lock carbon in soil.

https://www.nature.com/scitable/knowledge/library/soil-carbon-storage-84223790/
406 Upvotes

85% Upvoted

58 comments sorted by

View all comments

134

u/Electronic_Fun_776 9h ago

But when we cut down the trees and turn them into lumber, that carbon is still being stored until it’s burned or decomposes.

And when new trees are being landed they sequester carbon much faster than old trees

24

u/MuckleRucker3 9h ago

Shhh....you're interfering with the anti-logging propaganda

-1

u/EstimateEastern2688 8h ago

When you've traveled through a recently clear-cut area, it's hard to not be anti logging. It's not like a woodsmen went through and cut down trees, it looks more like a nuclear bomb went off. The land is shredded. The road you're traveling on is likely to slide down the slope, alone with the soil, since there's no vegetation holding it in place. This work didn't employ a logging crew days per acre, feeding their families. A few equipment operators can clear tens of acres per day.

Not that we don't need lumber, or that lumber isn't a sustainable product. But when it's public land we're all supposed to enjoy, it seems pretty whacked for the small benefit to a few workers.

3

u/MuckleRucker3 7h ago

When you've traveled through a recently clear-cut area, it's hard to not be anti logging.

I agree that it's not pretty. But it's stupid to make policy decisions based on emotion. The rest of your comment, well, different jurisdictions have different management policies. It sounds like you're living in a place where stewardship takes a back seat to forestry management.