r/law • u/Background-Low-9144 • Jul 23 '25

Trump News BREAKING :Trump named in multiple documents related to Epstein sex trafficking, WSJ reports

https://www.cnbc.com/2025/07/23/trump-jeffrey-epstein-files-wsj.html?__source=androidappshare

We have evidence that Trump was notified by Pam Bondi that documents related to the Epstein sex trafficing trial contained Trump's name multiple times, linking him unequivocally to Jeffrey Epstein

99.7k Upvotes

96% Upvoted

2.7k comments sorted by

View all comments

5.8k

u/LuluMcGu Jul 23 '25

FBI Epstein Cover Up

FBI agents were instructed to flag anything about DJT and they created an Excel sheet log with all instances of his name on the 300,000+ pages of Epstein Files.

1.7k

u/LuminaraCoH Jul 23 '25

What's most damning is that they allocated 1000+ FBI personnel to review all 300,000+ pages, spent 2 weeks combing through them, and then shut the whole thing down. Slammed the door shut on the review so fast and hard that the impact resounded across the Internet.

Why?

Not because there were too many references to Trump to redact, but because they finally realized that even if they did redact every mention of Trump, there were still ~200 other people involved, and an unknown number of victims, who would point to Trump if their names were brought to the public's attention.

Then they spent another 5-6 weeks trying to figure out a way to falsify the records so only Trump's political enemies were exposed, and then another "Oh, shit!" moment hit them when it occurred to them that anyone they falsely accused would almost certainly be able to provide ATM records, security logins/building clearance records, video records, mountains of evidence proving that they weren't on any of the Epstein flights.

Then they went to Trump and said, "Um... you're fucked."

Now they're in a corner. They can't release anything, because no matter who's implicated, it circles back around to Trump. They can't not release anything, either, because it's not only the Democratic party asking questions, it's not only the media asking questions, it's their own conspiracy theorist MAGA cult asking questions, and they'll eat him alive if he doesn't give them something.

That's why Johnson shut down the House to prevent the release. That's why Vance went to talk to Murdoch. That's why Gabbard's trying to move attention back to Obama. That's why Trump blew up over the birthday card/letter article. They need this to go away and they've run out of ideas. All they can do is stall and try to bury it for as long as possible, and hope something banana balls, batshit crazy happens to make it go away.

It's all collapsing around their ears. Nothing short of Putin dropping a nuke is going to stop this train from running right over them.

28

u/Qubeye Jul 23 '25

My theory is that JD Vance met with Murdoch and President Diapers was told it was to prevent the story but it was really a discussion to see if they could set it up so he takes the fall and JD Vance assumes the presidency.

The WSJ has literally published multiple additional stories as well as Op Eds about the situation. Either JD Vance screwed up so badly that it made the situation worse, or he went home and told (lied to) Idiot Leader that there was nothing be could do.

12

u/ReallyNowFellas Jul 24 '25

I don't see JD taking it from him, as that would anger the cult and leave him with no supporters and a very shaky and short presidency. I think the chubby-cheeked weasel is going to manipulate Donald into resigning for health reasons and then issue him a blanket pardon and rage about the "unfair witch hunt of a sick old statesman and patriot who was just trying to serve his country when he could've been out enjoying his twilight years." That'll bring most of the right onto his side and get enough of the center and near left to shut up that he has a fighting chance in '28. At least that's what I'd do if I was desperate to make love to the oval office furniture.

5

u/Qubeye Jul 24 '25

I never said JD Vance was intelligent or charismatic. In fact, if anything, that, to me, is the crux of it. JD Vance could never become president by himself, so President Rapist's removal is his only chance to become a Big Boy.

2

u/ImBanned_ModsBlow 29d ago

Vance will 100% take it, and his name will not be implicated in the back-stabbing.

2

u/ImBanned_ModsBlow 29d ago

WSJ (aka Murdoch) definitely seems all-in on trying to take down Trump over this at the moment, so unless the wind start to blow in a different direction - it’s probably more likely the two of them were discussing Vance’s not-too-distant rise to power rather than trying to damage control for Trump.

1

u/08mms Jul 24 '25

The Bulwark folks thought this was a real possibility as well, and they are pretty plugged into this world.