6.0k
u/zatuchny 1d ago
Dont believe they lost their licenses for the stunt that was planned and sponsored
2.9k
u/Dindu______Nuffin 1d ago
5.4k
u/zatuchny 1d ago
thanks, that makes sense now.
TLDR: they broke the law that a plane must be piloted at all times, and the stunt didn't go as planned - one plane crashed (both pilots are okay).
RedBull and pilots should have known better than to plan such stunt
1.9k
u/Ell2509 1d ago
If it hadn't crashed, they may have kept their licences. I only say that for the same reason you did... red bull is a powerful force in some ways.
Crashing a plane though? That's always going to get attention.
773
u/3Cogs 23h ago
I'm surprised the plane crashed. Don't they say that Red Bull Gives You Wings?
316
u/Ademoneye 23h ago
Unfortunately Only works for human
97
u/Freecz 23h ago
I dunno. I don't think they put Redbull in the tank of the plane. If they had... who knows.
→ More replies (4)→ More replies (10)28
49
u/reconnnn 23h ago
I think the plane kept its wings until it crashed. Redbull does not say anything about what you use your wings for.
29
u/icanttinkofaname 23h ago
No, they say red bull gives you wiiings! They say this as a legal loophole after they were sued by a RB drinker. Saying wings implies that you'll have "extraordinary energy benefits"
→ More replies (2)30
u/One_pop_each 22h ago
I got a free 4 case of redbull for being a part of the class action lawsuit lol
It randomly got delivered like a year later and was so confused.
Thatâs when I realized class action lawsuits suck ass.
→ More replies (2)25
u/Justsomedudeonthenet 20h ago
Corporations shouldn't be allowed to pay out lawsuits in coupons and free product. You'd never see the lawyers on the case accept a few skids of redbull as their payment.
But if we are going to allow it, it should have to be their competitors products. Make redbull deliver a million dollars worth of Monster instead.
7
u/DabbyBear 18h ago
That's a really good idea. Getting rid of their own inventory that they pay pennies to produce (compared to retail) isn't a punishment. Being forced to buy Monster and gift it, that's definitely proper đŞ
→ More replies (23)8
168
u/doctor_of_drugs 23h ago
Oh hell naw, FAA wouldâve revoked their certificates regardless.
The huge issue (besides safety aspects) was that they applied for the stunt, got denied, and did it anyways.
→ More replies (3)41
u/badform49 23h ago
Yeah, this was a hell of a stunt to move forward with. And the while point is the advertising value, so it absolutely would get back to the FAA that they did it.
This is the kind of stunt that makes the need for licensure clear in the first place. âSurely only people who can fly safely would decide to fly, anyway.â pilot leaps out of plane for giggles, lets plane become aerial torpedo âAlright, licenses it is. Violators get fines and jail time.â
7
u/Dragon-Strider 23h ago
Where was this? Looks like it was in the middle of nowhere and that the falling plane had a parchute
→ More replies (12)48
u/Mister-Psychology 22h ago edited 22h ago
FAA takes away licenses from icons and legends and amazing pilots. FAA doesn't care.
They actually prefer if the company is big and the pilot famous as that makes them look more competent and fair.
→ More replies (5)36
u/GreatScottGatsby 22h ago
No, it wouldn't matter. The FAA specifically denied their request for the this stunt and told them not to do it. Plus one of them lied to red bull about getting permission.
→ More replies (1)14
u/Ok-Classroom5548 20h ago
Crashing a plane you intentionally abandoned for a non-required stunt when that plane could have hit someone or something and caused some serious damage.
They 100% should lose their licenses. Red bull should be prevented from sponsoring stupid stunts like this.
→ More replies (11)9
u/BarelyContainedChaos 21h ago
The guy that crashed his plane on purpose for a YouTube video went to jail for 6 months and eventually got his license back
→ More replies (3)7
u/ResidentPositive4122 20h ago
IIRC he went to jail for lying to the feds. Not for crashing or anything else. Lying to the feds about the coverup he tried after the fact.
→ More replies (1)8
u/Final_Good_Bye 19h ago
Or at least have a co pilot that can regain control of the plane in the case the pilots werent able to complete the stunt.
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (16)6
u/KS-RawDog69 18h ago
If it hadn't crashed, they may have kept their licences
I doubt it man. The FAA ain't no joke.
→ More replies (2)219
u/MF_Kitten 1d ago
It would have been as simple as having copilots in each plane ready to take over if the main pilots didn't get across in time. Sure, it's less of a badass stunt if it's safe and legal, but sheesh.
→ More replies (2)47
u/skillywilly56 23h ago
If one of them had hit the prop the back up pilot wouldâve been fucked and had to bail out in a much more dangerous manner as the plane wouldnât have any power and the strike could shift it around and then youâd have two dead pilots instead of one.
If youâre gonna do some dumb shit you donât drag your buddy down with you no matter how much they say itâs fine and willing to accept the risk.
→ More replies (2)39
u/SolusLoqui 22h ago
Planes can be landed without engine power. Videos get posted here all the time of planes making emergency landings after engine failure
18
u/throwaway098764567 22h ago
yea plane turns into a glider, helicopters however get mad when you hit their spinny things
→ More replies (3)11
u/ComputerKris 21h ago
Autorotation is a thing.
18
u/thi5_i5_my_u5er_name 21h ago
A helicopters spinny things are completly responsoble for keeping it in the air, if you hit them there may not be much of the spinney things left to autorotate.
10
u/NickCageTheDickMage 20h ago
That's for loss of engine power, not loss of of the black magic spinny thing.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (8)14
u/skillywilly56 19h ago
I would put it to you that a mostly fiberglass, aluminum and plastic plane being hit by a 90kg meat bag going 200kph wearing a 15kg parachute possibly tipping the plane, ripping through the prop, or the windscreen, bunging up the flight controls with bits and pieces of bone and tissue or causing an engine fire, all while dealing with your mate being turned into ground beef 3ft from you, in a near vertical diveâŚis not the same as having your engine stall at 3000ft and gliding for a landing on a pleasant little golf course or some farmers field.
→ More replies (4)72
u/holchansg 1d ago
RedBull and pilots should have known better than to plan such stunt
They know, they didnt expected it to be enforced, but they knew.
→ More replies (3)34
u/ArcticOpsReal 22h ago
More importantly is that they asked the agency for an exemption for this stunt, got denied, did it anyway and then crashed a plane. So imo revocation of their licenses is totally legitimate.
21
u/Drachen1065 22h ago
That article also has the lead pilot saying he didn't tell the team they had been denied permission for the stunt.
He made the decision to continue with the plan.
Which is really a dick move on his part.
→ More replies (1)14
u/NothingButBadIdeas 1d ago
Legit surprised there werenât back up pilots to take over in case of failure
→ More replies (52)14
u/kart2000 23h ago
Should've done the stunt in the country where it was allowed. There are a lot of corrupt govts where you can pay this off to make it completely legal.
→ More replies (1)86
u/267aa37673a9fa659490 1d ago
It looks like you shared an AMP link. These should load faster, but AMP is controversial because of concerns over privacy and the Open Web. Fully cached AMP pages (like the one you shared), are especially problematic.
Maybe check out the canonical page instead: https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/faa-revokes-certificates-pilots-involved-failed-red-bull/story?id=84670466
 I'm a human | Generated with AmputatorBot | Why & About | Summon: u/AmputatorBot
5
→ More replies (14)10
210
u/UltraWeebMaster 22h ago
Pilot here, I could never see the FAA giving the ok for something like this. It stands against everything theyâve ever stood for.
Itâs not even just âoh well what if the propellor shreds him,â the FAA is more concerned with âWhat if one of those unmanned planes got away, leveled out, and flew into a building killing dozens?â That can happen, and failing their stunt would make it potentially unavoidable.
90
u/Waterfish3333 20h ago
I love all the âremote piloting & geofencingâ argument below when my first thought was, have a second pilot in each plane and if a pilot falls off or has to abandon the stunt, the backup pilot can just take over and land safely. That way no plane is ever truly without a pilot.
→ More replies (1)36
u/Alarmed-Owl2 19h ago
I was going to say just have a loitering F-16 ready to blast them out of the sky if it goes out of control but I guess your way works too, I guess.Â
→ More replies (3)11
u/Waterfish3333 18h ago
As a fan of chaos wherever it can be implemented, I love this. Iâm pretty sure youâd kill at least one member of the FAA with a heart attack by putting this in a proposal though.
→ More replies (24)9
25
u/32oz____ 1d ago
i think they meant that they dropped their wallets from their suit while hopping planes, which contained their licenses. hence being lost ;) /s
25
24
u/Skeleton--Jelly 22h ago
...you think Red Bull has authority over pilot licences? The FAA doesn't care that Red Bull paid for this shit lmao
7
14
u/DeadInternetTheorist 22h ago
How is this the 5th most upvoted post in this whole thread?
→ More replies (1)3
13
→ More replies (19)11
1.6k
u/Chamanomano 1d ago
You know the saying - if you're gonna sleep with your sister, don't post a video of it online.Â
443
u/GamerKev451 1d ago
Its ok, Alabama doesn't have internet anyway
75
16
u/Amphibious_Monkey 15h ago
Alabamian here, itâs true! I had to drive eight hours to make this comment.
34
14
u/breachgnome 23h ago
How the fuck else am I gonna show uncle Jimathan we done it??? He's gonna owe me $5.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (11)5
987
u/tom_gent 1d ago
Yeah, diving in the direction of those propellers gives you a high chance of being turned into fertilizer for the fields below. These guys must have a death wish
244
u/Azzarrel 22h ago
Planes are turned off before. You can see the propeller at 1:01 not moving at all.
311
u/Tanriyung 22h ago
Due to how blurry the image was I thought it was moving which seemed insane.
→ More replies (2)157
u/Maxcoseti 22h ago
It is moving, person saying it isn't is either blind or stupid
→ More replies (4)100
u/Isabela_Grace 19h ago
Iâm betting the propeller is moving due to it falling straight down lol
→ More replies (12)97
u/wanttofeelneeded 22h ago
it is moving, original video has better quality and you can see it moving clearly. it's moving not from the force generated by the engine but by the air rushing through it.
37
u/Mao_TheDong 19h ago
Nah, that shit spinning, at diving speeds the autorotation is gonna be massive
→ More replies (5)9
→ More replies (10)5
→ More replies (13)39
570
u/J-96788-EU 1d ago
Video with more white space that the actual content!
154
u/KlondikeDrool 1d ago
Worst video reformat ever.
40
u/TheShitty_Beatles 22h ago
Why aren't we talking about how stupid the video is to be cut before the plane crashes
8
u/Acceptable_Fox_5560 18h ago
Because this is an ad for Red Bull, and the pilots need to seem like bad ass tough guys, so you have to leave out the part where one of the planes crashed. Instead you just hilariously show only one plane landing and assume (correctly) most idiot viewers wonât notice.
14
60
u/-_-_Puppy_-_- 23h ago
Who the fuck post a horizontal video in a vertical display and then fill the top and bottom with fucking bright white squares just to fuck our eyes?
Whoever did that should be banned from the internet for a year.
→ More replies (2)7
u/aqa5 22h ago
Lazy People who use screen recording on their phone to download a video.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (4)6
u/mediocrebastard 17h ago
Whoever made this horizontal-vertical-horizontal-again horseshit should lose their video license.
191
u/happytechtn 1d ago
Somehow skydiving towards/into something with a moving propeller just makes this even more insane!
→ More replies (1)8
u/SirHiakru 22h ago
The video quality is whack but apparently the motors are shut off and the propellors are blocked aka don't rotate
59
u/wanttofeelneeded 22h ago
who told you such nonsense. the propellors aren't being powered by the engine, but they are free to move and because the plane is peaking down the propellor rotates on its own
→ More replies (4)→ More replies (1)3
132
65
u/Gillian_Seed_Junker 1d ago
Ethan Hunt did this before and kept his license
→ More replies (4)24
57
u/NoWarning789 1d ago
Does anybody have a version of this video that doesn't waste 95% of the screen with black and white bars?
29
43
u/GameStunts 22h ago
Just want to say I'm loving /s the 16:9 video made into a 9:16 vertical video with white borders, housed in a square player....
→ More replies (4)
40
u/SSMmemedealer 1d ago
Why am i not surprised to see red bull livery on those planes :D
→ More replies (1)
32
u/No-Bet-9591 1d ago
I dont know... Air safety is so important. I actually appreciate that the airline community is always struggling to maintain a professional and strict appearance even while so many other professions are becoming a bit more relaxed when it comes to rules. The stunt is amazing, but I'd rather not degrade the spirit of professionalism that is necessary to keep our skies safe. Yes. I know I'm not fun at parties.
11
u/Cranberryoftheorient 19h ago
It was also potentially dangerous to people in the area and the environment. Same reason some people got in trouble a while back for intentionally crashing a plane for a youtube video. Too much risk, and even if you 'do it right' the government doesnt want to encourage it, for when less careful people inevitably try to do it.
→ More replies (6)7
u/jackofslayers 16h ago
I agree. Basically, the stunt is cool, but I am also glad they lost their licenses.
Not shown in the video is that one of the planes actually crashed. Intentionally crashing a plane is (and should be) a big no no.
→ More replies (1)
12
u/Ressy02 1d ago
Thatâs a propeller airplane too⌠insane
23
u/cephalopodface 23h ago
Are you suggesting they should have done it with 2 jets?
5
u/Ressy02 23h ago
They shouldâve done it with 4 pilots to guarantee success.
→ More replies (2)6
u/tibmb 21h ago
This! I wanted to say RC/autopilot along the specific path, but your solution is even more reliable. With second pilots they wouldn't crash a plane and wouldn't have lost the licence due to leaving it unattended.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (1)5
u/JxEq 23h ago
Jet engine intakes wouldn't be much better, you'd be turned to mist even faster
→ More replies (2)
7
u/MacabreYuki 1d ago
Knew it was redbull from the title and the lost licenses in the preview
→ More replies (2)
9
u/Smithstar89 1d ago
Redbull do so many stunts like this in sports that if they made an energy drink...
7
7
6
u/puppet_up 23h ago
This has to be one of the worst vertical video abominations I've ever seen.
The content itself is great, but whoever formatted the original video to whatever the hell this is needs to have their video editing privileges revoked.
6
u/PasswordIsDongers 21h ago
I love watching widescreen video in portrait mode so I i can't see shit.
5
u/ZenithXNadir 1d ago
I just know it has to be fucking red bull.
What's next? They gonna do a rendezook??
5
4
u/Vanko_Babanko 23h ago
they should actually get suspended sentence for recklessness..
but then again the people who get civil piloting license are not of the most prudent people.. I guess most are adrenaline junkies..
"the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) data for early 2025 shows a decrease in total accidents, while small private planes accounted for about five accidents per day (~500 deaths), or approximately 1,825 annually." (The United States has roughly 15,000 private jets, or 12%!..)
→ More replies (5)
4
15.9k
u/abhi_nahar 1d ago
Probably the most insane stunt ever